View Single Post
Old 09-09-2008   #44 (permalink)
techres
Building Bridges Between Ammo Forts

 
techres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bloomington
Posts: 3,944
techres has a reputation beyond reputetechres has a reputation beyond reputetechres has a reputation beyond repute
techres has a reputation beyond reputetechres has a reputation beyond reputetechres has a reputation beyond reputetechres has a reputation beyond reputetechres has a reputation beyond reputetechres has a reputation beyond reputetechres has a reputation beyond reputetechres has a reputation beyond reputetechres has a reputation beyond reputetechres has a reputation beyond reputetechres has a reputation beyond reputetechres has a reputation beyond reputetechres has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Episcopus View Post
Bigamy hurts undesireable males. Undesireable males are, by and large, who write our laws. There is nothing inherently wrong with bigamy or communal marriages.
Bigamy is likely less damaging than adultery, but I find it difficult to believe that any 3-4+ person arraignment can be as stable as a family requires. Perhaps in the context of a community that can force cohesion it is possible, but lacking that, bigamy (or "polyamory") is just a mess of divided love, etc.

At the same time, and the only thing that really matters here, is wether the state has any business in it at all. Frankly, it does not. Adults are free to do things with other consenting adults.

If adultery is no crime, then I cannot see how bigamy is.

Much of this arguing would cease if we just did not have the State (gov't) in the game of marriage. Frankly, having the state involved does as much damage to religion as religion does to the state.
techres is offline   Reply With Quote