View Single Post
Old 09-23-2008   #11 (permalink)
Hoosier8
Expert
 
Hoosier8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,319
Hoosier8 is a splendid one to beholdHoosier8 is a splendid one to beholdHoosier8 is a splendid one to beholdHoosier8 is a splendid one to beholdHoosier8 is a splendid one to beholdHoosier8 is a splendid one to beholdHoosier8 is a splendid one to beholdHoosier8 is a splendid one to behold
I am starting to see the usual liberal elitist spin about the Republican candidates. The Republicans traditionally have usually tried to paint the Democrats as big spenders. On the opposing side, the liberal elitists, usually associated with the Democrats, try to paint the Republican candidates as "to stupid to run the country". I hear this now about McCain, he is too out of touch, he is too old, all implying that he doesn't have the brains to do the job. I heard it from liberal elitists now about Palin. She is just too stupid to do the job.

The liberal elitist said it about Bush until the GPAs of Kerry and Gore turned out to be lower, then they dropped it, even though they made their impression on the sheep who kept it up.

They said it about Reagan, "Ronnie Raygun". Too stupid and dangerous to have his finger on the button.

Hmmm, I would like to see Obama's GPA, which he won't release, probably for a good reason. It might detract from his "brilliant" moniker from the liberal elitists.

Calling your opponent stupid and; thereby, dismissing any debate is an easy way to deflect scrutiny of the issues.

The Democrats have been in charge of the Congress and have done nothing about the current crisis, yet claim no responisbility.

Quote:
Conservatives loved Bush because he was "resolute" when all it was was him being unwilling to look at facts & say "I was wrong". That's not a noble trait in my opinion.
How is this any different?
Hoosier8 is offline   Reply With Quote