View Single Post
Old 07-03-2009   #34 (permalink)
Disposable Heart
Generation X's Moonchild Extraordinaire!
 
Disposable Heart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Occupied Protectorate of Avon
Posts: 2,174
Disposable Heart has a reputation beyond reputeDisposable Heart has a reputation beyond reputeDisposable Heart has a reputation beyond reputeDisposable Heart has a reputation beyond reputeDisposable Heart has a reputation beyond reputeDisposable Heart has a reputation beyond reputeDisposable Heart has a reputation beyond reputeDisposable Heart has a reputation beyond reputeDisposable Heart has a reputation beyond reputeDisposable Heart has a reputation beyond reputeDisposable Heart has a reputation beyond reputeDisposable Heart has a reputation beyond reputeDisposable Heart has a reputation beyond repute
Alright, I am going to pull this car over and cut a switch, tan all ya'll hides!

There is only one safety that means a damn! Its the one twixt thine ears! "Active" safety guns require more attention (keeping it on safe). "Safetyless" guns require more attention as well (keeping safe while on it?). But both require one thing: attention to detail. Depending on a passive or active safety or none to keep one safe is not the point: Its what one does with the gun, how they carry it and how they know how to employ it is what matters.

This crap about what type is better is gibberish with a capital GIBBER. All guns require intelligence and meaningful due dilligence. After reading the arguements here, it has turned into a brand war. Next, I guess folks will tell me that my brain (wired in Mexico, final assembly in Fort Walton Beach Florida ) isnt the correct one for a particular type of gun?
__________________
Found on another forum: "I tried bobbing the hammer on my Ruger Vaquero. That was a bad idea..."
Disposable Heart is offline   Reply With Quote