| Forgive me, Brian, if I sound argumentative, but I'm curious as to the reasoning behind this...
Why is it called a "Pistol" course if the focus is not on the pistol itself? Your company has separate courses for unarmed combatives (which actually seems like a good place to teach what to do if you can't get to your pistol), blades, rifles, shotguns, and expandable batons, all of which seem to focus on the items in their respective titles, but the advanced pistol class doesn't help you use your pistol more effectively and efficiently? At least that's the message I'm getting from your post and the website. (by the way, your force-on-force and gun retention pages appear to be missing -- you might want to have your web guru check the link hrefs to those).
__________________ "Some of the findings are perhaps contrary to popular perceptions; for example, over the 5-year study period [2000-2004], the use of knives/cutting instruments was over three times more prevalent than the use of a gun. (Based on Table 8.)" http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/schoolviolenc...troduction.htm |