![]() |
| |
|
Welcome Hoosiers to INGunOwners.com. You are currently viewing our firearms community as a guest which gives you limited access to many features. By joining our community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, and much more! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, CLICK HERE to join our community today! |
| |||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Not an expert... always learning! ![]() Join Date: May 2008 Location: Wabash
Posts: 1,505
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | S&W 38 Spl Water + Denim Test Handgun: Rossi M68, 1-5/8" barrel Ammo: S&W 158gr +P LSWCHP A while back I did a bare water jug test on some old S&W "FBI load" rounds. I got back good penetration and good expansion. Today I set out to see what would happen when it passed through four layers of denim before entering the water. ![]() The usual setup, but with four layers of denim. ![]() A front view... Here I've been including a movie of the shot. Unfortunately I was shooting by myself today and didn't have someone to run the camera. ![]() This is the front jug after the shot. Not much disruption compared to the bare jug I shot before. Hmmm... ![]() The second and third jugs seem relatively unaffected. When shooting without denim, the second jug showed quite a bit of disruption - about as much as the first jug in this test. ![]() As it turns out, the bullet did pass through all jugs, stopping in the fifth, making a small hole and creating a leak. ![]() Here is my revolver, a dime, the fired bullet and an unfired round for reference. ![]() A closer look at the bullets. Notice the fired bullet is missing quite a bit of its nose. Upon closer inspection it looks as if it was chewed away by "something." ![]() And another view. When I went into this test I wasn't sure what the outcome would be. Modern bullets are designed to prove themselves against accepted testing protocol, but though this is an "old technology" round, I kind of expected a bit more to happen since water tends to cause cause the most bullet upset when compared to 10% gelatin and wetpack. While I'd like to test further, perhaps against another manufacturer of the same style bullet, I don't feel too handicapped. First, this was a short barrel. Second, I have penetration, which is a good thing. Lastly, this bullet did a bit better against four layer denim covered jugs than a 125gr +P round that I tested did against bare water jugs. Though that round expanded a bit, it didn't penetrate well. Josh <><
__________________ ![]() The Roman Empire fell due to a large, corrupt government, overspending, an overextended military, insecure borders, and the illegal immigration of Goths, barbarians (anyone who was not educated), and religious fanatics. Sound familiar? |
| | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| *TEST* "Short Barrel" 135gr+P Gold Dot Water/Denim | Josh Smith | Accessories and Gear | 9 | 07-24-2008 07:50 |
| Test By Request: BH 124gr+P GDHP Water/Denim | Josh Smith | Accessories and Gear | 2 | 05-15-2008 06:17 |
| Rem 115gr Standard Pressure Water + Denim Test | Josh Smith | Accessories and Gear | 0 | 05-10-2008 13:09 |
| Water/Denim Bonded Golden Saber Report | Josh Smith | Accessories and Gear | 0 | 05-10-2008 13:06 |