Hi folks.
As of this writing I am up to my eye balls in .300 AAC loading both sub and super. I never wanted to be here, I never had an interest in the .300 AAC. having said that let me explain my delimma. I have been trying to find a workable subsonic load for the 7.62 X 39. I have achieved a sub load but for the life of me I can't get one that will cycle in anything. I do realize that our Fed govt, has probably spent somewhere in the neighborhood of several million dollars (give or take $10.00) developing the .300 AAC sub and they work great. There are a couple of outfits that sell subs for the 7.62 X 39 that are suppose to work but I can't bring myself to pay their inflated prices so I don't really know if they in fact will cycle in an AR, SKS, AK, etc with or wthout a suppressor.
I have always believed that there is no one smarter that all of us. Do any of you have a workable data that will make this old man happy?
All comments are welcome
God bless,
Rog
As of this writing I am up to my eye balls in .300 AAC loading both sub and super. I never wanted to be here, I never had an interest in the .300 AAC. having said that let me explain my delimma. I have been trying to find a workable subsonic load for the 7.62 X 39. I have achieved a sub load but for the life of me I can't get one that will cycle in anything. I do realize that our Fed govt, has probably spent somewhere in the neighborhood of several million dollars (give or take $10.00) developing the .300 AAC sub and they work great. There are a couple of outfits that sell subs for the 7.62 X 39 that are suppose to work but I can't bring myself to pay their inflated prices so I don't really know if they in fact will cycle in an AR, SKS, AK, etc with or wthout a suppressor.
I have always believed that there is no one smarter that all of us. Do any of you have a workable data that will make this old man happy?
All comments are welcome
God bless,
Rog