David Workman, the Seattle Gun Rights Examiner is reporting on a newly arisen effort on the parts of some green groups to ban lead ammunition through the auspices of the EPA. Despite the fact that there is no evidence that lead ammo plays any part in raised health or environmental levels.
via Seattle Gun Right Examiner
If they can't ban guns, they'll do the next best thing. Someone has failed to look at the unintended consequences of their actions. Causus Belli, indeed.
via Seattle Gun Right Examiner
Read the rest at the source.On Tuesday, a coalition of environmental groups petitioned with the Environmental Protection Agency asking that lead-based sporting ammunition and fishing tackle be banned.
What that could ultimately mean to Evergreen State gun owners, hunters and anglers is not only much higher ammunition prices, but a dramatic loss of revenue for the Department of Fish & Wildlife, because declining ammunition and tackle sales translates to a decline in federal excise tax revenues, which in turn will result in a decline in federal monies apportioned to this and other states through the Pittman-Robertson and Dingell-Johnson federal wildlife and fisheries restoration programs. That money is administered by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Almost immediately, the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) threw down the gauntlet.
“There is simply no scientific evidence that the use of traditional ammunition is having an adverse impact on wildlife populations that would require restricting or banning the use of traditional ammunition beyond current limitations, such as the scientifically based restriction on waterfowl hunting,” said NSSF President Steve Sanetti.
If they can't ban guns, they'll do the next best thing. Someone has failed to look at the unintended consequences of their actions. Causus Belli, indeed.