New Local Ordinance

[ocsdor]

Post signs throughout town saying: Attention, Criminals! Unarmed, wealthy victims waiting for you at town hall."

And, walk around, with the sign, outside of town hall every time the council has their meetings.

[AFA1CY]

Originally Posted by ocsdor

Post signs throughout town saying: Attention, Criminals! Unarmed, wealthy victims waiting for you at town hall."

And, walk around, with the sign, outside of town hall every time the council has their meetings.

I would like to see those signs out front of all the anti gun people. Do you think Sara Brady would mind?

[wwdkd]

From what I understand it is legal for the council to pass this legislation. That being said I won't be moving to that town anytime soon.

[aikidoka]

Hammond has similar. No firearms on city property or at city meetings even IIRC or in parks or on park roads. I have no idea if the bike trials in Hammond are considered park roads, which sucks.

[cosermann]

Good example of why governments should own as little property as possible.

[aikidoka]

Originally Posted by cosermann

Good example of why governments should own as little property as possible.

Yes, and with an ordinance like this I think they should have to post clearly what is city property when they dont allow firearms.

[versuchstier147]

Once it passes in one town, they'll all be taking notice...

I read in the paper a few weeks/months ago Franklin(?) built a new bullet proof conferance room at town hall, or something. I don't remember exactily what or where.

And Cigarettes, Christ. They tax the hell out of you to get them, then fine you for smoking them in public places.

I belive leo can pat you down without having any reason at all. So, that ordanance I don't thik really adds anything to that.

[Shadow]

The Second Amendment Patriots
Firefighter ,i clicked on this site but it would not open.

[jim b]

I read the same story in the paper last week and it really surprised me. I was upset that they did not even mention who brought this up and who voted for it. But, the journalism in the local paper leaves a lot to be desired!

So are they going to be posting no weapons signs on all of the city property or are we just supposed to know it is city property? The city ownes a lot more property than you initially realize. For example, how about the parking lot next to Rosenburgers? That is city owned I believe. Does my wife or I run the chance of being searched ever time we park there? What if i want to fishing on the stretch of river that runs through the park?

[Mgderf]

I'm sure it was Arizona last year or the year before, that passed a law that said if an entity (including governmental agencies) were going to ban possession of firearms on government property, they must provide SECURE STORAGE available at EACH location that is affected by the ban.

We need to get something like this going here!