![]() | |
| | #262 (permalink) |
| Plinker Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Greenwood
Posts: 104
| If standing up for what I believe and calling out those who I believe do not understand how the work works, makes me a bully than so be it. But I am not surprised by that comment. Some people are afraid of a debate and want to bad mouth those that disagree. I do have to give Rambone props, he stands up for what he believes in, even if I don't agree |
| | |
| | #263 (permalink) | |
| Grandmaster Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,895
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #264 (permalink) |
| Grandmaster Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Hamilton County
Posts: 11,631
| Back on the OP....we have a piece by Indiana's own, Radley Balko taking a look at one of the major reasons I will never cast a vote for Gingrich. His stance on the war on drugs is abominable and I have seen nothing to make me think that he's changed his stance on it. Executing people for having as little as 2 ounces of pot on them? Escalating a lost "war"? This stance alone, and it's intended and unintended consequences makes him unelectable. He wants to start a real war within the boundaries of this country, and if he thinks it wouldn't end in shooting he's insane. He's not what we need at this time, or any other time. He's a long time supporter of big government and has no intention of making things better. Newt Gingrich, Drug Warrior Extraordinaire | The Agitator |
| | |
| | #265 (permalink) | |
| Expert Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,795
| Quote:
I don't think Newt is unelectable based on his positions. Mitt Romney doesn't even have positions and he has been a "frontrunner" for a long time. Newt is probably the smoothest of the bunch. Most voters are not going to dig into his record like you and others have. | |
| | |
| | #266 (permalink) | |
| Grandmaster Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Hamilton County
Posts: 11,631
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #267 (permalink) |
| Expert ![]() Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Defensible hilltop compound in Rural Southern Indiana
Posts: 1,488
| That comment thoroughly excludes the author from any further serious consideration. On the one hand you have an intact populace to temper any imaginary attempts to mold the "One World Government" scenario. On the other you have a society steeped in anarchy and being fully focused on mere survival. The comparison is sheer idiocy or simple sensationalism.
__________________ To be born free is a gift.....To die free is a responsibility. IF YOU GIVE THEM AN INCH, EVENTUALLY THEY'LL BECOME A RULER. |
| | |
| | #268 (permalink) | |
| Grandmaster Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Hamilton County
Posts: 11,631
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #269 (permalink) | |
| Expert ![]() Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Defensible hilltop compound in Rural Southern Indiana
Posts: 1,488
| Quote:
__________________ To be born free is a gift.....To die free is a responsibility. IF YOU GIVE THEM AN INCH, EVENTUALLY THEY'LL BECOME A RULER. | |
| | |
| | #270 (permalink) |
| Expert Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: NWI
Posts: 1,251
| Regarding mrjarrel's comment on gridlock; we don't have gridlock. I define gridlock as nothing getting done. Unfortunately, Obama and his gang are getting things done to the detriment of all of us. Consider the stonewalling on "Fast and Furious", or the blocking of the pipeline from Canada, or the endless push to grow govt. I read that in his first two years, federal employee increased by 140,000. In the latest issue of American Rifleman, there is an article by LaPierre regarding Obama's desire to disarm us, interesting and scary read. IMO, while each GOP candidate has their shortcomings, these shortcomings pale in the spectre of Obama getting four more years. Folks, what will we have left? |
| | |
![]() |
| Tags |
| globalism , neocon , newt gingrich , nwo |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |