![]() |
| |
|
Welcome Hoosiers to INGunOwners.com. You are currently viewing our firearms community as a guest which gives you limited access to many features. By joining our community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, and much more! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, CLICK HERE to join our community today! |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Marksman Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Southside of Indy
Posts: 662
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Interesting I stole this from another forum..........it is, shall we say, thought provoking if it's true. Heck, it's thought provoking even if it's completely false! Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well as Vermont 's own Constitution very carefully, and his strict interpretation of these documents is popping some eyeballs in New England and elsewhere. Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and require them to pay a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would become the first state to require a permit for the luxury of going about unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning a gun. Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not only affirming the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as a clear mandate to do so. He believes that universal gun ownership was advocated by the Framers of the Constitution as an antidote to a "monopoly of force" by the government as well as criminals Vermont 's constitution states explicitly that "the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State" and those persons who are "conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms" shall be required to "pay such equivalent." Clearly, says Maslack, Vermonters have a constitutional obligation to arm themselves, so that they are capable of responding to "any situation that may arise." Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required to register their name, address, Social Security Number, and driver's license number with the state. "There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the state should they be asked to do so," Maslack says Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the least restrictive laws of any state .. it's currently the only state that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit. This combination of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has resulted in a crime rate that is the third lowest in the nation........ Vermont's Right Not to Bear Arms | The American Prospect ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Ya' gotta' like this guy!
__________________ DRob...."If Con is the opposite of Pro, is Congress the opposite of Progress?" |
| |
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| INGO Bishop of Bacon ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Verify range to target, one RFC792 ICMP type 8 packet only, please.
Posts: 11,927
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
__________________ Quote:
Classifieds Rules: http://ingunowners.com/forums/firear...e_posting.html INGO FAQ (recommended): http://ingunowners.com/forums/genera...qs_sticky.html | |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A very interesting op-ed | Ter | General Political Discussion | 2 | 09-26-2009 19:05 |
| Interesting | Hoosier Gun Coat | General Political Discussion | 7 | 07-16-2009 09:46 |
| Interesting | Paul | Break Room | 2 | 02-04-2008 14:38 |