If the LCP is anything like the Kel-Tec P3at, then I would suggest the Sig. Unless it is for defense only, and you don't want to have fun with it at the range.
Don't own either, but am looking for an LCP whenever I can actually find one. The 232 is a pretty big gun if you have not held one yet, I'd think you could find a 9mm in the same size, hence my decision to get a trur pocket gun, the LCP.
You needs may vary but that is my thinking. Also check out the Bersa .380, it compares nicely to the Sig and is more LCP in price.
I only said that because the Kel-Tec isn't a whole lot of fun to shoot at the range. The Sig, on the other hand, would be a little more bearable to shoot at the range, if you were just wanting to shoot around.I just want her to have a reliable safe shooter that she can carry and I might plink around it with some too.
She has small hands so I was kinda leaning toward the Ruger LCP, but I know the Sig is reliable, but bigger.
I don't believe the Ruger LCP was intended as a primary defense pistol.
Please make sure you post threads in the appropriate forum.
I am going to be picking up a little .380 for the wifey and I plan to shoot it some too. ANY suggestions, which of the 2 would you recommend and why?
I know the Sig is higher priced and easier to find, but anything other than the obvious would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance!