MIM Gun Parts?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Wabatuckian

    Smith-Sights.com
    Site Supporter
    Industry Partner
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 9, 2008
    3,062
    83
    Wabash
    Hello,

    I learned about MIM, casting, forging, etc in college a while back.

    MIM and casting always seemed to have about the same weaknesses in my mind.

    After ordering and installing this MIM safety on my 1911, I got to taking a hard look on what's NOT forged in modern firearms.

    Turns out, almost everything in non-custom guns is MIM. Armscor uses MIM frames (Armscor makes these for STI, RIA, and until recently, Charles Daly). Kimber is pretty much all MIM. Wilson uses MIM.

    Remingtons have a lion's share of MIM parts and the company owns its own MIM plant.

    Smith and Wesson revolvers are using MIM parts internally.

    Colt uses MIM.

    Ruger, if I read right, uses cast frames and slides with MIM internals.

    They all hold up well. Yet people hate MIM.

    Why? And what are your experiences with MIM?

    I personally had ONE MIM part ever break on me. It was a joint on an ambi safety from first year Charles Daly 1911 production, and it had an obvious flaw. In other words, it was a goofed step in the process, not the process itself.

    So, what are your feelings on MIM? Are they functional? Have they made all our firearms into crap?

    Josh <><
     
    Top Bottom