HUSSEIN Obama ANTI-GUN

[Montana Patriot]

To all the fine gunowning patriots of Indiana, i am writing this to you to get every gun owner in Indiana to vote against Hussein Obama as he is a very Socialist Anti-gunner from ILL. Back in 1996 Obama introduced a bill to completly OUTLAW ALL GUN OWNERSHIP in the state of ILL. This man stated that if elected he would institute a law to ban the legal ownership of guns to all americans. This is a very very Dangerous Socialistic person who will say anything to get elected. In fact Hillary Clinton isn't any better as she also stated that she would reinstate the assault weapons ban if she is elected. I don't know the answer as i am getting sick and tired of voting for the lesser of 2 evils but i see John Mcain as the only answer unfortunatly. Here in Montana we have given the US Supreme court notice that no gun law will be passed in Montana that violates our state constitution. Any one with any questions can contact me at any time. By the way my Gr grandfather and aunt who fought in the civil war is buried in Valpariso IND and i have many cousins and friends living there and have been to Indiana many times. Thanks for your time.

Montana Patriot billburgan@hotmail.com

[clickclickboom]

save the "hussein" fear mongering :rolleyesedit:

[4sarge]

Originally Posted by clickclickboom

save the "Hussein" fear mongering :rolleyesedit:

I'm not quite sure that using a person's legal name qualifies as fear mongering. It would be easy enough to have it legally changed. I do understand Senator Obama's reluctance to be compared to the savage dictator but it is his legal name, like it or not. With a 20 year mentor the likes of Jeremiah Wright it is hard to decipher what Obama's actual views are other than, Change. Change to Socialism, Secular Progressive views, or ? Obama is definitely anti gun and seems to lack the values that most citizens hold dear. I'm not into wealth redistribution or the continuation of the great welfare society that we have been subjected to.

Next thing you know, someone will say it's racist to criticize anything about his elitist views because Obama is black.

Whatever his name or race, he is elitist (Obama) and definitely not a protector of the Constitution, gun rights or individual freedoms and if elected a one term President.

[melensdad]

OK, I'm not sure if using the name HUSSAIN is fear mongering or not, but it is used to evoke anti-Islamic emotions.

As for Obama, his a a through and through ANTI-GUN ULTRA-LIBERAL and no matter how much he attempts to hide it behind his comments about 'sporting traditions' he is the same senator who wanted to ban gun stores within 5 miles of any school or any public park. That would have outlawed almost every guns store in the nation. He is a also the senator who wanted to outlaw the self-defense with a weapon law in Illinois when a Wilmette resident used a legally purchased gun to defend himself and his family from a burglar in who broke into his house for a second time in a week.

Obama is clearly a liar and an anti-gunner.

As for the backhanded attacks and inuendo against his religion, maybe I'm old enough to know some Muslims who are good people and not members of the radical nut wing of Islam, so I can live without those ***** slaps using his name. JMO

[hunter480]

Originally Posted by melensdad

OK, I'm not sure if using the name HUSSAIN is fear mongering or not, but it is used to evoke anti-Islamic emotions.

As for Obama, his a a through and through ANTI-GUN ULTRA-LIBERAL and no matter how much he attempts to hide it behind his comments about 'sporting traditions' he is the same senator who wanted to ban gun stores within 5 miles of any school or any public park. That would have outlawed almost every guns store in the nation. He is a also the senator who wanted to outlaw the self-defense with a weapon law in Illinois when a Wilmette resident used a legally purchased gun to defend himself and his family from a burglar in who broke into his house for a second time in a week.

Obama is clearly a liar and an anti-gunner.

As for the backhanded attacks and inuendo against his religion, maybe I'm old enough to know some Muslims who are good people and not members of the radical nut wing of Islam, so I can live without those ***** slaps using his name. JMO

I don`t want to hijack the thread, so I`ll be brief. But IF you truly DO know "good" muslims, and I question whether or not this is just a case of saying whatever to make a point, truthful or not, then you`re a minority.

I`ve not seen nor heard even ONE condemnation by any muslim group, about what happened on 9-11 in this Country. So after seeing the footage of bodies falling off the Trade Center Towers, I say, any anti-muslim sentiment anyone has here, is justified.

[melensdad]

Originally Posted by hunter480

I don`t want to hijack the thread, so I`ll be brief. But IF you truly DO know "good" muslims. . .

I do, and I have been with some that have condemned the 9-11 attacks. I have even prayed with some for peace, for healing, and for those who are radicals so that they can see their errors, despite the fact that I am Catholic and they practice Islam.

If you don't know any then you need to go out and meet some.

Last time I checked, this forum was to bring together Indiana gun owners to talk about guns. If this is the forums for lily-white Indiana males can come to talk about trashing religions then I am in the wrong place.

Originally Posted by TRWXXA

"Those who would give up essential liberty for a little temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security." -- Richard Jackson (probably)

The quote was often trotted out when the war on terror was initiated, referring to the added levels security imposed upon us. I recently realized that the author was probably not talking about something as obvious as all that, but something more insidious like universal health care, mortgage bailouts, and other social programs. Why risk failure in a free-market society, when the nanny-state can take care of all your worries?

The test of a real Constitutional Conservative is to see if he/she can discern the meanings of those words. Nice to see you join the group.

[hunter480]

Originally Posted by melensdad

I do, and I have been with some that have condemned the 9-11 attacks. I have even prayed with some for peace, for healing, and for those who are radicals so that they can see their errors, despite the fact that I am Catholic and they practice Islam.

If you don't know any then you need to go out and meet some.

Last time I checked, this forum was to bring together Indiana gun owners to talk about guns. If this is the forums for lily-white Indiana males can come to talk about trashing religions then I am in the wrong place.


The test of a real Constitutional Conservative is to see if he/she can discern the meanings of those words. Nice to see you join the group.

Not my intent at all to trash anyone-I, however, have the same right to share my opinions as anyone else here, even you.

And thanks ever so much for defining a REAL conservative for me.

[Pami]

Originally Posted by melensdad

I do, and I have been with some that have condemned the 9-11 attacks. I have even prayed with some for peace, for healing, and for those who are radicals so that they can see their errors, despite the fact that I am Catholic and they practice Islam.

If you don't know any then you need to go out and meet some.

Last time I checked, this forum was to bring together Indiana gun owners to talk about guns. If this is the forums for lily-white Indiana males can come to talk about trashing religions then I am in the wrong place.

As often as I disagree with you Mel, I definitely agree with you on this point.

[TRWXXA]

Originally Posted by melensdad

OK, I'm not sure if using the name HUSSAIN is fear mongering or not, but it is used to evoke anti-Islamic emotions.

Naaaahhh... I use Obama's middle name to evoke anti-Obama emotions.

Originally Posted by melensdad

Many people don't value their rights. They prefer government handouts and are willing to abdicate rights and responsibilities that go along with rights

"Those who would give up essential liberty for a little temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security." -- Richard Jackson (probably)

The quote was often trotted out when the war on terror was initiated, referring to the added levels security imposed upon us. I recently realized that the author was probably not talking about something as obvious as all that, but something more insidious like universal health care, mortgage bailouts, and other social programs. Why risk failure in a free-market society, when the nanny-state can take care of all your worries?

[quicksdraw]

I can honestly say that I work with several Moslems that have denounced the 9-11 attacks and are every bit as decent as anyone on this board.
But I do believe that electing Obama would be a major disaster.