Gay Group Protest Palin Pick

[Episcopus]

Originally Posted by Bill of Rights

share a foxhole with someone like Sarge or Episcopus-or any of several others on this BB.



Blessings,
B

Are you hitting on me?

[Cwood]

Originally Posted by Episcopus

Are you hitting on me?

I dont wanna know! I DONT WANNA KNOW!!!!!!

[Bill of Rights]

Originally Posted by Episcopus

Are you hitting on me?

Unless you're female, you're not my type.

Blessings,
B

[4sarge]

Originally Posted by Episcopus

Except when it is committed against an LEO, an employee of a penal facility or juvenile detention center, a firefighter. Or when it causes injury to an LEO, an employee of a penal facility or juvenile detention center, a firefighter, a person under 14 if committed by one over 18, a mentally or physically disabled person if done by someone with care of that person, an employee of a school corp, or a health care provider. Special classes exist to protect people who are more at risk or who need more protection.

In theory, I agree with you. Everyone should be the same. In practice, not everyone is the same and different groups of people sometimes need different or extra protections.

The groups that you first listed are public service "Job Related" NOT Lifestyle or sexual preference related - Big Difference in my book. Should alcoholics or drug users be a "Protected Class"? Where do we draw the line?

[Episcopus]

Originally Posted by 4sarge

Where do we draw the line?

Exactly. I don't know either. I truly think it depends on whether you think sexual preference is a choice or a biological function. I don't know the answer to that, either. It will take far better scientists than me to determine it.

[rjwin1967]

I don't believe the gay groups have anything to worry about. She can't deny gay marriages by herself and there's certainly not enough support in the legislature to do anything. This country has much more important issues anyway. If gays want to marry, who cares? If that entitles their partners to employee health insurance, so what? I don't deny them their rights and I expect them to leave mine alone as well. They can do what they want as long as they refrain from preaching to chldren that their lifestyle is normal. It is not normal. 2 mommys or 2 daddys is not normal.

[Bill of Rights]

Originally Posted by Episcopus

Exactly. I don't know either. I truly think it depends on whether you think sexual preference is a choice or a biological function. I don't know the answer to that, either. It will take far better scientists than me to determine it.

Speaking strictly anecdotally, I can no more look at some guy's hairy *** and think it attractive than I can not find these NSFW pictures attractive.

So yeah, I think it's genetic.

Blessings,
B

[techres]

Originally Posted by Bill of Rights

Speaking strictly anecdotally, I can no more look at some guy's hairy *** and think it attractive than I can not find these NSFW pictures attractive.

So yeah, I think it's genetic.

Blessings,
B

And I will fight for your rights to have access to those pics. I will even support you by looking myself whenever my wife is not around. Happy to take one for the bill of rights!

[Bill of Rights]

Originally Posted by techres

And I will fight for your rights to have access to those pics. I will even support you by looking myself whenever my wife is not around. Happy to take one for the bill of rights!

Your patriotism is noteworthy, sir, and I salute you!

Blessings,
B

[Episcopus]

Originally Posted by techres

And I will fight for your rights to have access to those pics. I will even support you by looking myself whenever my wife is not around. Happy to take one for the bill of rights!

NSFW means not safe for wife, right?