![]() |
| |
|
Welcome Hoosiers to INGunOwners.com. You are currently viewing our firearms community as a guest which gives you limited access to many features. By joining our community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, and much more! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, CLICK HERE to join our community today! |
| |||||||
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Master Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,082
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | California bans 'brides,' 'grooms' California bans 'brides,' 'grooms' License rejected for couple seeking traditional marriage Posted: September 08, 2008 9:05 pm Eastern By Chelsea Schilling © 2008 WorldNetDaily ROSEVILLE, Calif. – "Brides" and "grooms" are no longer allowed to be married in the State of California. That privilege is only extended to individuals who allow themselves to be called "Party A" and "Party B" on marriage licenses. Pastor Doug Bird of Abundant Life Fellowship in Roseville, Calif., was alarmed to find the state now rejects the traditional terms after he officiated his first marriage ceremony last week following the California Supreme Court decision to overturn Proposition 22. The couple had written the words "bride" and "groom" next to "Party A" and "Party B" because they wanted to be legally recognized as husband and wife. However, the Placer County license was denied. "I received back the license and a letter from the Placer County Clerk/Recorder stating that the license 'does not comply with California State registration laws,'" Bird said in a statement from the Pacific Justice Institute. It was an "unacceptable alteration," the County Recorder's Office claimed the State Office of Vital Records determined. "What's next?" Bird wrote in a Sept. 4 letter. "Will the State of California force [ministers] to use the terms "Party A" and "Party B" in the ceremony itself?" In a 4-3 decision, California's high court declared that legal definitions of marriage as a union between a man and a woman were unconstitutional. Since the ruling, the generic designations have been added to legal documents. Pacific Justice Institute President Brad Dacus said voters must change the state constitution by voting on the [COLOR=blue! important][COLOR=blue! important]marriage [COLOR=blue! important]amendment[/color][/color][/color] in November if they wish to preserve the traditional meaning of marriage. "Unless Proposition 8 is passed, heterosexual couples will be forced to wed out of the state if they wish to be officially identified as bride and groom or husband and wife." He said in a statement. "This is a major slap in the face for traditional marriage."
__________________ Mourning BUT I'm SIG Compliant |
| | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Kimber and California | abnk | Politics, Laws and 2nd Amendment | 0 | 06-27-2008 05:45 |
| A BAN on Handgun Bans - brilliant bit of writing. | Lars | Politics, Laws and 2nd Amendment | 3 | 06-18-2008 19:20 |
| California new draconian FFL regulations | melensdad | General Firearms Discussion | 1 | 06-13-2008 02:05 |