![]() |
| |
|
Welcome Hoosiers to INGunOwners.com. You are currently viewing our firearms community as a guest which gives you limited access to many features. By joining our community you will have access to post and respond to topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content, and much more! Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, CLICK HERE to join our community today! |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Somewhat Purple-ish ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Indiana
Posts: 4,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | No badge? You're NOT Welcome. Before I launch my rant, I want to say two things: 1. This is not a criticism of any individual who happens to be a police officer. 2. I realize that the training opportunities for non-law enforcement civilians are greater in both number and diversity now than at any time in the past, and I appreciate it! Given that . . . On another public (i.e. not LEO-only) forum, I just read an announcement for yet another class that looked interesting, but it was only for cops and military. Each time I see something like that when it's obvious it's not something that should be confidential, it irritates me. It also continues to add to the ever-widening "us vs. them" attitude that exists on both sides, but is fueled far more vigorously on the LEO side (in my opinion). How do you guys feel about LEO-only classes? How would it be received if a class were offered, but people who are police officers were specifically disqualified? At the very least, when something like this has restricted access (regardless of the merits thereof), the least they could do is not advertise it in places where the vast majority of readers will not be elligible to attend. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Marksman Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 300
![]() ![]() | Is there any possibility of there being something else going on that isn't readily apparent? What I mean is- Why is it restricted? Is the restriction coming from the instructor, school, or from the host facility? I've seen class announcements that were LE/Mil only and sounded like it was coming from the instructor or school. It often comes across like it was some members only club, so ha ha ha for the rest of us. But in SOME cases, it has turned out that the restriction was due to some ruling by the host facility, insurance carrier, or maybe even some goofball local law, and getting around them would be such a can of worms it wouldn't be worth the trouble. If it IS a case of we have it and you can't get it, then yeah, screw them. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Marksman Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 338
![]() | Rhino, I've had the same experience on several occasions and it always ticks me off. I feel unwanted, as if they (military, LEOs, etc.) think I am not worthy becasue I am a "mere" civilian, when I know that I and many of my friends are as good shooters as any of them. That said, I don't think these restrictions are necessarily imposed because the decision maker(s) believe civilians are less competent shooters. Sometimes the training is held on LEO or military ranges that are off limits to civilians (which raises other questions of course). Or perhaps they don't want "us" to learn all their secret tactical skill sets (or the high speed, low drag secret squirrrrl handshakes). In any event, yes, it pisses me off! |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Plinker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Orange County
Posts: 178
![]() ![]() ![]() | That was my post. I try to post all Indiana firearms training classes that I receive info on. ITOTA sent me an email and there are some IN Tactical officers/Mil on that site as well as here, 10-8 and M4C that could take advantage of it. It's been deleted Last edited by IDCC; 04-07-2008 at 19:41. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| Somewhat Purple-ish ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Indiana
Posts: 4,086
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
What you others guys have said about range and insurance restrictions certainly makes sense. Given that the current example (graciously reproduced above) is at the academy, perhaps that is a factor in that case. On the other hand, we all know that the range is not always resticted and that it's not always some kind of insurance issue. Frequently (if not most of the time), it's simple an example of an exclusive mindset, and one that I think has an increasingly negative impact on cop <--> non-cop relations. Those who might suffer the most are those police officers who do NOT share the same attitude, but will be inevitably guilty by association. In a lot of cases, it's not even the specific class. It's the principle and the message it sends. That is why what Ken Campbell does at the Boone County range is so valuable and commendable ... he goes out of his way to make as many classes as possible are inclusive. I think that's good for all of us on both "sides." pierce195 ... thanks for the invitation! Sooner or later you'll see me in your neck of the woods. I'll see you in a couple of weeks at RileyCC too. | |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| PD Training LLP ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: New Castle, IN
Posts: 266
![]() ![]() | Rhino, Sorry, I know most goverment owned ranges are limited by insurance companys. You also know that cops are the best marksman. (LOL). You are more than welcome to shoot with me about our FOP range anytime. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Master Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,078
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Same here, City Insurance Provider would not allow anyone but sworn officers to shoot on the pistol range. They claimed it was a liability issue that they would not cover for non sworn participants. Have you inquired of why it is a closed session. It might not hurt to ask
__________________ Mourning BUT I'm SIG Compliant |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Plinker Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Orange County
Posts: 178
![]() ![]() ![]() | Tactical Firearms Combination Course (3 day): This course is designed to utilize all weapons systems used by the entry operator. Course of instruction will include using tactical handgun, sub-gun, carbine and shotgun. Course length: 3 days Dates: May 27- May 29 2008 Location: Indiana Law Enforcement Academy County Road 700 E, Plainfield, Indiana, 46168 Phone: (317) 839-5191 Facility used: Firearms range Class size: 24 Course cost: 1. ITOTA members: $285.00 2. Non Members: $350.00 Pre-requisites: 1. Sworn Tactical, Law Enforcement officer in an “on duty” capacity. 2. Tactical medic in an “on duty” capacity with prior SWAT and CQB training. 3. Active duty Military in an “on duty” capacity. 4. Sworn Tactical, Corrections officer in an “on duty” capacity. Lead Instructor: The lead instructor for this course is a decorated, recently retired ('08) Sergeant Major from the US Army's top counter-terrorism unit. He has over 21 years of active service which includes extensive CT and combat experience. Prior to his retirement, the Sergeant Major served 10 war-time deployments including multiple tours in Afghanistan and Iraq. He's conducted hundreds of real-world CQB and sniper CT operations in multiple hostile environments on a wide range of target profiles. As an active duty Sergeant Major and sniper element leader, he was recognized in the SOF community as a weapon's subject matter expert in both operational use and technical knowledge of arms, optics, suppressors and ammunition. As senior sniper for his unit, he was responsible for all sniper weapons, equipment and Tactics, Techniques & Procedures (TTP) development in the War On Terror. The Sergeant Major has introduced cutting-edge operational concepts, equipment and SOPs to his former unit, US Special Operations Command and the greater conventional sniping community. Gear requirements: 500 rounds of ammo per weapon system. Complete tactical gear/ kit including; wrap around eye and ear protection, ballistic helmet and vest, hydration system, head cover and rain gear. Day 1: Pistol • Introduction/ background/ determine levels of experience within class. • Equipment inspection (duty gear) / CQB gear configuration discussion • Zero confirmation • Fundamentals of pistol marksmanship refresher • Misc. Drills (1 shot, 2 shot, etc) • Combat reloads • Tactical reloads • Multiple targets • Shooting while moving • Target discrimination • Strong hand only • Weak hand only • Alternate positions Day 2: SMG / Carbine • Equipment inspection (duty rigs) / CQB gear configuration discussion • Sighting options • Fundamentals of SMG / Carbine marksmanship refresher • Zero confirmation (optics and iron sights) • Misc. Drills (1 shot, 2 shot, etc) • Back-up sights • Combat reloads • Tactical reloads • Multiple targets • Shooting while moving • Target discrimination • Strong side • Weak side • Alternate positions • Night firing with sights, lights and lasers • Use of vehicles for cover Day 3: Combination Pistol/ SMG /Carbine • Transitions • Barriers • Long range pistol/SMG contingency shots (50 to 100 m/y) • Competition drill / event (if desired) • Exterior & Terminal ballistics / ammunition selection discussion ITOTA Or call us at: PO Box 3446 (812) 878-SWAT Terre Haute, In. 47803 Only 24 slots available! Payment in advance is required to hold your seat. Cancellations must be done in writing within 30 days prior to the first day of the conference without penalty. No shows, without canceling in writing, forfeits registration fees |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Plinker Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Avon
Posts: 193
![]() | Otherwise known as Delta? Reading over the curriculum it sounds like a bad *** class.
__________________ http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/922/norris08nh0.jpg |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |