ACOG reticle pics

[Lock n Load]

Here is a pic of the TA01 at dusk: (camera wouldnt focus)

And here it is at total darkness:

My TA31F during daylight:

And on the rifles: (with an EoTech 512)

 

[LPMan59]

nicely done. i have the ta33-8 with the yellow chevron. based on your clear pics, i think the red might show up a bit better. i would have loved to have gotten a red horseshoe, but for the price i paid, beggars can't be choosers.

 

[42769vette]

here is a few threw the scope pics ive taken on acogs. i thought i had more but aparentlly not

 

[Shooter1]

I wish I took pictures of my TAO1NSN after 200 rounds! Not to bash ACOG but a 900 dollar scope should not have the reticle flake! Whoever seen "battle LA" and noticed the ACOG reticle had translucent blotches, that was what mine did! Their customer service sucks also! I still have mine and havent shot it yet since they fixed it. I will say the hold overs are near perfect with 69 smk's. Ill run it in May again to see what happens.

 

[furbymac]

ok somebody educate me. i just don't see 900 dollars here. are you paying for some superman scope or are you paying for the fact that the military uses these or what.

 

[peloe16]

how do ya like the eotech? im thinkin of getting one for my ar......once i finish it.

 

[slow1911s]

ok somebody educate me. i just don't see 900 dollars here. are you paying for some superman scope or are you paying for the fact that the military uses these or what.

You're paying for arguably the best glass at that price point. For reticles that are practical - easy to use up close and at distance. And for rugged, reliable construction.

 

[Lock n Load]

ok somebody educate me. i just don't see 900 dollars here. are you paying for some superman scope or are you paying for the fact that the military uses these or what.

I didnt pay that much for either of mine, I bought/ traded for used ones. They are very durable optics, built like tanks.... and once you use them you will see that they are top tier optics.

how do ya like the eotech? im thinkin of getting one for my ar......once i finish it.

I like the Eos... although 2 were sold/ traded off to finance the ACOG purchases. Eos have also have had some reported issues but personally the 4 or 5 that I have owned over the years have been trouble free.

 

[42769vette]

ok somebody educate me. i just don't see 900 dollars here. are you paying for some superman scope or are you paying for the fact that the military uses these or what.

theres alot of scope there for the price. etched glass, extreamly clear glass, lumination, correct bdc, toughness. the only down side is the eye relief and i had a ta01. that model has the worst eye relief in the line

 

[j706]

I have never owned or even looked through a ACOG. Does the arrow point interfere with precision aiming? I assume that one would zero so the tip of the arrow is impact point?

I have a Leupold MK 4 1-5X that I like pretty well for my precision AR. It is repeatable and has good glass but still overpriced IMO. Eotecs I have zero use for after two (2) bad ones. The ACOG's look pretty clear and small in size. I am gonna have to check one out sometime.

 

[42769vette]

the arrow does effect precission shooting a little, but your not as much as the 4x zoom, your not really trying to shoot groups with a 4x optic often anyways. the acog was designed more for mom (minute of man) than moa (minute of angle) .

the thing i liked about the acog in my limited expearence with them is that i took it sighted it in @ 100 and at 600yds you could hit a 600 yd man size target every time. you wern't really working for head shots but they were all body shots.

to be honest i did not care for and sold my ta01 acogs. the eye relief was a deal breaker for me. then i shot some witha ta33 (i think) it was the model with more eye relief. the eye relief still was not what i liked but it was workable.

 

[j706]

the arrow does effect precission shooting a little, but your not as much as the 4x zoom, your not really trying to shoot groups with a 4x optic often anyways. the acog was designed more for mom (minute of man) than moa (minute of angle) .

the thing i liked about the acog in my limited expearence with them is that i took it sighted it in @ 100 and at 600yds you could hit a 600 yd man size target every time. you wern't really working for head shots but they were all body shots.

to be honest i did not care for and sold my ta01 acogs. the eye relief was a deal breaker for me. then i shot some witha ta33 (i think) it was the model with more eye relief. the eye relief still was not what i liked but it was workable.

Thanks

 

[tv1217]

TA-31H