CEO of Bushmaster breaks silence on Newtown.

[Bluedragon]

Not sure if this has already been posted but if it has then sorry for the dupe.

MILLER: Bushmaster CEO breaks silence on Newtown school shooting -EXCLUSIVE - Washington Times

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Lawrence ODonnell.....sheesh...

 

[Bluedragon]

Yeah I thought "merchant of death" was a bit much.

 

[indykid]

He basically parroted something I said right after the murders. Lanze killed his mother, illegal. Stole the weapons, illegal. Stole her car, illegal. Put the weapons in an automobile for transport by a minor, illegal. A minor in possession of firearms in Connecticut, illegal. Brought them onto school property, illegal. Being on school property with no reason- trespass, illegal. Murdered 25 more people, illegal X 25.

Of course as we all know, background checks would have stopped all the above illegal activity... or not.

I am glad the CEO of Bushmaster finally spoke out pointing out that inanimate objects aren't a problem, it's the people. But we all know that.

 

[UncleMike]

I am glad the CEO of Bushmaster finally spoke out pointing out that inanimate objects aren't a problem, it's the people. But we all know that.

We know that.....
The problem is how to convince the idiot Politicians!

 

[Trooper]

The progressives, especially the feminists in the Victorian Age, blamed demon rum. Thus Prohibition. It is easy to demonize something. Harder to deal with people.

 

[cobber]

The progressives, especially the feminists in the Victorian Age, blamed demon rum. Thus Prohibition. It is easy to demonize something. Harder to deal with people.

Better to demonize something, rather than somebody.

Feelings might get hurt!!

 

[indykid]

The progressives, especially the feminists in the Victorian Age, blamed demon rum. Thus Prohibition. It is easy to demonize something. Harder to deal with people.

So true. Those who want control, know that you can't control people directly, so you control inanimate objects that can't fight back, whether at the ballot box, verbally, or physically.

 

[Fullmag]

So true. Those who want control, know that you can't control people directly, so you control inanimate objects that can't fight back, whether at the ballot box, verbally, or physically.

During the "slick Willy" years it was in vouge to put the picture of the weapon in the news, not the person. If it was a gun then the gun did it or a knife then the knife did it. The gun probably had a Mug shot and a record to!

 

[drillsgt]

During the "slick Willy" years it was in vouge to put the picture of the weapon in the news, not the person. If it was a gun then the gun did it or a knife then the knife did it. The gun probably had a Mug shot and a record to!

The news still does this, if it's a crime report (not even necessarily with a firearm) they show a gun picture.

 

[Trigger Time]

Wolverines

 

[Trigger Time]

During the "slick Willy" years it was in vouge to put the picture of the weapon in the news, not the person. If it was a gun then the gun did it or a knife then the knife did it. The gun probably had a Mug shot and a record to!

While Clinton was certainly no friend to gun owners, lets remember that daddy bush started the first ban. Reagan was no friend of the 2nd either.

I don't claim either party but we should remember the history of both. Republicans helped prevent disaster this year but if we fail to stay vigilant and remind them we are watching them and holding them accountible to protect our natural rights, then they will happily vote to abolish them.

Most politicians are no friend of liberty. They are forked tongue devils.

 

[actaeon277]

During the "slick Willy" years it was in vouge to put the picture of the weapon in the news, not the person. If it was a gun then the gun did it or a knife then the knife did it. The gun probably had a Mug shot and a record to!

The news still does this, if it's a crime report (not even necessarily with a firearm) they show a gun picture.

When they put a picture on the news, a table with some guns on it, and they are implying "see, this person is guilty. Look at all these guns."......
has anyone looked at the table and said, "Eh. Nice start. A few years ago I only had that many."

 

[actaeon277]

And now I'm waiting for CPT Nervous to correct my grammar. I know that last entry bombed the grammar department.

 

[BravoMike]

I didn't think an AR-15 was used? I thought it was two handguns and the AR-15 was later pulled out of the trunk? I'm so confused.

 

[actaeon277]

I didn't think an AR-15 was used? I thought it was two handguns and the AR-15 was later pulled out of the trunk? I'm so confused.

Fixed.

 

[BravoMike]

Fixed.

Thanks, I was really torn on whether or not that should be in purple.

I guess you could say that I was really confused....

Wait, what? Did I get that right?

 

[actaeon277]

Thanks, I was really torn on whether or not that should be in purple.

I guess you could say that I was really confused....

Wait, what? Did I get that right?

Yes.









No.







Wait, what was the question?