Hopefully he goes for a swim and a shark eats him.
His comments should be grounds for impeachment. He advocates violating 'Ex Post Facto' which is expressly forbidden in the Constitution.
In their minds it not unConstitutional till they have ruled on it. A judge like this, (and like many another, so-called "conservative" or not) would likely rule it to be Constitutional. His mind is already made up. And SCOTUS is a slippery bunch anyway, so never count on them ruling the way we might like. Heller was a squeeker and wasn't as solid as we might have liked.Yup.
This article was posted on an aviation-related forum I'm on about a week ago, and I pretty much said the exact same thing.
"Does it terrify anybody else that a FEDERAL JUDGE would advocate an unconstitutional law?"