What limitations to the Second Amendment are acceptable to you?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • "Username"

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 14, 2016
    190
    16
    Everywhere, so far.
    I am guessing most folks here have heard how X% of gun owners support Y.

    Y is usually defined as background checks, requiring stamps for automatic firearms, or other such nonsense.

    I will start with answering the question "none".
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    50,881
    113
    Mitchell
    I'm ok with prisoners not being allowed guns while in jail.
    I'm ok with the prohibition of guns being used for illegal acts like murder, robbery, assault, etc.
    I'm ok with private property owners exercising their rights and regulating guns on their property.

    I think all arms that the police and other government agencies can purchase should be allowed for all others.
     

    Sylvain

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 30, 2010
    77,313
    113
    Normandy
    CfSc2WbUAAADClW.jpg
     

    singlemalt

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 4, 2015
    208
    18
    Frankfort
    I am guessing most folks here have heard how X% of gun owners support Y.

    Y is usually defined as background checks, requiring stamps for automatic firearms, or other such nonsense.

    I will start with answering the question "none".


    "Shall not be infringed" Where is the except for part? I must've missed it.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    A better question is. How many 2nd Amendment limitations that are proposed by the candidates that you vote for acceptable to you?
     
    Last edited:

    22/45

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 14, 2016
    25
    1
    Around the loop
    I'm ok with prisoners not being allowed guns while in jail.
    I'm ok with the prohibition of guns being used for illegal acts like murder, robbery, assault, etc.
    I'm ok with private property owners exercising their rights and regulating guns on their property.

    I think all arms that the police and other government agencies can purchase should be allowed for all others.


    Sums it up pretty well. Should've ended the thread there :)
     

    KittySlayer

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 29, 2013
    6,474
    77
    Northeast IN
    Alright now that we have written down our intent in clear language let's start issuing licenses to carry and get all those muskets registered. After lunch we can debate the common sense limits on the number of musket balls and powder horns that apply to the lowly citizenry outside this hall.

    Who took the ink well and quill with the purple ink?





     

    Sylvain

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 30, 2010
    77,313
    113
    Normandy
    A better question is. How many 2nd Amendment limitations that are proposed by the candidates that you vote for acceptable to you?

    That's a defeatist attitude already.The 2A is already infriged upon.
    Why pick the guy/gal who's willing to add the least ammount of limitations?

    You should look at a candidate who's willing to repeal current limitations, not add more.

    Some candidates want to get rid of the NFA, ATF etc ... others want to ban more type of guns, magazines, type of ammo etc ...

    But hey, what do I know ... I ain't voting.
     

    Alpo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Sep 23, 2014
    13,877
    113
    Indy Metro Area
    I would eliminate the following words from the second amendment:

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    That's a defeatist attitude already.The 2A is already infriged upon.
    Why pick the guy/gal who's willing to add the least ammount of limitations?

    You should look at a candidate who's willing to repeal current limitations, not add more.

    Some candidates want to get rid of the NFA, ATF etc ... others want to ban more type of guns, magazines, type of ammo etc ...

    But hey, what do I know ... I ain't voting.
    Exactly my point. That's why I've stated previously. My vote in this election is for the 2nd Amendment. I will not consider a candidate who currently proposes any type of new limitation.
     

    2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,046
    113
    NWI
    That's a defeatist attitude already.The 2A is already infriged upon.
    Why pick the guy/gal who's willing to add the least ammount of limitations?

    You should look at a candidate who's willing to repeal current limitations, not add more.

    Some candidates want to get rid of the NFA, ATF etc ... others want to ban more type of guns, magazines, type of ammo etc ...

    But hey, what do I know ... I ain't voting.

    Trump says he will get GFZ's repealed.
     
    Top Bottom