The problem I'm having with my opposition on this thread is that, while they have some deeply held beliefs that I share, pretty much all they've done in this thread is say "That's the way I feel about it and you should too!" They haven't advanced any particular arguments about the "federal agent bureaucracy" being too big, or that agents of the Air Force don't have a valid reason to pursue their investigations off Air Force property (I'm mean, they SAY that, but they don't say why that should be so) and in general are getting all upset because they haven't made a good case that we can agree with.
Rambone and others like to sandbag us with misleading "thread-lines" intended to get us all upset - and then when we discover it's not all that upsetting, he gets upset. Or maybe he just likes to fight - I'm not sure.
Make a reasoned argument for your cause and maybe I can take you off my "Ignore" list.
Rambone and others like to sandbag us with misleading "thread-lines" intended to get us all upset - and then when we discover it's not all that upsetting, he gets upset. Or maybe he just likes to fight - I'm not sure.
Make a reasoned argument for your cause and maybe I can take you off my "Ignore" list.