If I recall correctly, he had it slightly behind his hip concealed under his shirt. Not in the van. Yes, the cop was an ******* but it is illegal to print in Florida and if he didn't print the officer wouldn't have ever known. Other than some things that came out of his mouth I think the officer handled it relatively well.Looks Ok to me.
The drive looks like (we don't know) came out of the car (not normal) and was reaching back in to an unsecure space, 2 people to watch and one officer.
Sometimes taking control looks harsh, but it needs to work, it worked.
I am not a LEO so this is just my .o2
If I recall correctly, he had it slightly behind his hip concealed under his shirt. Not in the van. Yes, the cop was an ******* but it is illegal to print in Florida and if he didn't print the officer wouldn't have ever known. Other than some things that came out of his mouth I think the officer handled it relatively well.
790.053 Open carrying of weapons.—
(1) Except as otherwise provided by law and in subsection (2), it is unlawful for any person to openly carry on or about his or her person any firearm or electric weapon or device. It is not a violation of this section for a person licensed to carry a concealed firearm as provided in s. 790.06(1), and who is lawfully carrying a firearm in a concealed manner, to briefly and openly display the firearm to the ordinary sight of another person, unless the firearm is intentionally displayed in an angry or threatening manner, not in necessary self-defense.
Now that you mention it I believe it was after that went into effect and that's why it caused an uproar. Still not a big deal. Just have the officer call his supervisor and things will get straightened out and the officer will know for next time.Florida changed that law about printing and/or briefly exposing your concealed hand gun. I am not sure when this video was filmed, but the new law went into effect last year.
Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine
So if this was filmed after that law went into effect, then the police officer was wrong in stating that it was a violation of his permit to expose his firearm.