Looking at the link I am led to believe that the AG in Penn when like to get rid of all recipcrocity agreements. Target was FL.
I would have thought it easier to simply require Pennsylvania residents to have a PA license. That is what we do here.
No. None of you are reading this right. [STRIKE] He [/STRIKE]She wants to get rid of recognizing non-resident permits. That is, if you are from FL and have a FL permit, you're good to go. If you reside in PA and have a FL permit (because you can't get a PA permit), that will no longer be recognized.
As long as you have a license from your home state, you're okay.
No. None of you are reading this right. He wants to get rid of recognizing non-resident permits. That is, if you are from FL and have a FL permit, you're good to go. If you reside in PA and have a FL permit (because you can't get a PA permit), that will no longer be recognized.
As long as you have a license from your home state, you're okay.
As a result many people who would qualify anyplace else in the Commonwealth seek out of state permits to bypass Philadelphia.
...
This would not impact Indiana permits in PA because this has to do with the specific issue of carrying as a Pennsylvania Resident solely on an Out-of-State permit.
Correct me if I am wrong, but even in the good ol' Hoosier state, if you are an Indiana resident, I believe you are required to have an IN LTCH to carry in Indiana. My understanding is that an Indiana resident can not carry on another state's non-resident permit in Indiana. In that regard, is PA trying to pass legislation that is any different than what we already have in IN?