Apparently Chuck hasn't read Feinsteins current proposal.[FONT="]We are not supporting the ban but you do what you think you have to do. We are only supporting expanded background checks and including metal health data in these checks and funding for law enforcement. The ban as proposed is not in line with our beliefs but we do have the standing resolution to support the 94 ban but that has not been offered and as soon as we can take a legal vote at the conference i am of the believe that the delegates will agree with that stance. [/FONT]
[FONT="]Chuck Canterbury[/FONT]
The 94 AWB was nothing compared to her goals.
And, IMO, "Expanded background checks" is Liberal speak for "Firearm registration so we know whenever someone sells, gives away, or trades ANY firearm and later we can use some pretext to confiscate all weapons."
Except from the criminals who won't bother to register their illegal weapons in the first place.