Well it's about time.

[2A_Tom]

NFL rule revokes ?only ones? status of off-duty police - National gun rights | Examiner.com

Let the only ones live like the rest of us peons.

 

[mkgr22]

You see that as some kind of victory, huh?

NFL rule revokes ?only ones? status of off-duty police - National gun rights | Examiner.com

Let the only ones live like the rest of us peons.

 

[SSGSAD]

NFL rule revokes ?only ones? status of off-duty police - National gun rights | Examiner.com

Let the only ones live like the rest of us peons.

I WANT ALL of MY POLICE OFFICERS, ARMED at ALL TIMES !!!!! ( except bisard.....) !!!!!

 

[Concerned Citizen]

This is just plain damn stupid. NFL games are a high value target. Why on earth would you want to disarm the PROFESSIONAL Warriors in that situation???

 

[Lectric102002]

NFL rule revokes ?only ones? status of off-duty police - National gun rights | Examiner.com

Let the only ones live like the rest of us peons.

This makes no sense. The police still have arrest powers, even off duty. What purpose does it serve to disarm them ?

Do you have some inherent disdain for the police ?

 

[wtfd661]

OK, noted

 

[45fan]

This is just plain damn stupid. NFL games are a high value target. Why on earth would you want to disarm the PROFESSIONAL Warriors in that situation???

Police are hardly warriors, that is a title that lies solely with the military. The idea, or mindset that police are anything other than professionals who are sworn to protect and serve is the root cause of the trend toward the JBT mentality.

That said, I find it difficult to understand why anyone would think it a legitimate concern that those charged with protecting our citizens are armed 24/7. I would think that they would encourage them to carry, and benefit from a bit of extra free security.

 

[Concerned Citizen]

Police are hardly warriors, that is a title that lies solely with the military. The idea, or mindset that police are anything other than professionals who are sworn to protect and serve is the root cause of the trend toward the JBT mentality.

That said, I find it difficult to understand why anyone would think it a legitimate concern that those charged with protecting our citizens are armed 24/7. I would think that they would encourage them to carry, and benefit from a bit of extra free security.

Point taken. However, I am a Combat Marine, (Semper Fi, Brother!) and I know some police are veterans as well. Some POPO, though not veterans, Are what I would consider warriors as well. Many, sadly, are not even close.

 

[jedi]

NFL rule revokes ?only ones? status of off-duty police - National gun rights | Examiner.com

Let the only ones live like the rest of us peons.

Agree!

Looks like the NFL is all but asking for an incident to occur.

 

[terrehautian]

I think it is going to be safer to tail gate outside and watch on the big screens.

 

[jedi]

I think it is going to be safer to tail gate outside and watch on the big screens.

IJRC tailgating at least for the Chicago Bear games is now very limited and one needs tickets as well.

 

[deal me in]

I support this policy. Off-duty cops shouldn't be able to carry if LTCF holders can't. There are plenty of on-duty, armed cops at NFL games.

 

[Destro]

There are plenty of on-duty, armed cops at NFL games.

Taking a page out of the Brady Bunch playbook to further your cause eh?

 

[2A_Tom]

Personally, I really don't have a problem with police or any other citizen carrying anywhere. Just the idea that the only ones are the only responsible carriers.

And there is always this.
http://www.ammoland.com/2013/10/is-...paign=Feed:+ammoland+(ammoland)#axzz2h5AgIS1C

 

[deal me in]

Taking a page out of the Brady Bunch playbook to further your cause eh?

What cause?

 

[Destro]

What cause?

Promoting any further restrictions on CC is not helpful, your only furthering the idea that only "on duty" police need guns

 

[indydrew1]

Promoting any further restrictions on CC is not helpful, your only furthering the idea that only "on duty" police need guns

Of course your 2A rights out weigh property owners and there rights. You have a right to bare arms. You do not have a right to bare arms on my property if I say no. The NFL says no on there property.

 

[LANShark42]

Of course your 2A rights out weigh property owners and there rights. You have a right to bare arms. You do not have a right to bare arms on my property if I say no. The NFL says no on there property.

AND - you have the right to wear long sleeves... I guess...

 

[Denny347]

I could not care less. It's been years since I've been to a game. NFL can do as they please.

 

[BiscuitNaBasket]

It's their property and they can do what they want despite how dumb I think it is. I'm not a big fan of large gatherings like that anyways.