So the confiscation begins.................

[SSGSAD]

WOW!
On the positive side...There's a whole lot of people that swore to uphold and defend the constitution. Let me see.....Oh yea, both foreign and domestic enemies.

Yes, Harry, the problem with that is ..... "they" don't let ME decide WHO the domestic enemies ARE !!!!!

 

[Twangbanger]

More alarmist "pearl-clutching" from the old white guys. Don't you know that gun confiscation can't happen in America? I learned it on INGO (from young Millennial gun owners like Chester & that cop guy). Sigh...the NRA is just scaring you for donations.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Wake me when Indiana starts adopting California-style gun laws.

Wake up.

In fact we were years ahead of California: The Indiana Law Blog: Ind. Law - Judge uses "new law" to take guns from Carmel man [Updated]

 

[SSGSAD]

I am NOT a threat, just a crippled old man ..... REPEAT ..... OFTEN .....

 

[MCgrease08]

Yup, people deemed mentally dangerous enough to not own weapons reacting to LE showing up unannounced to take their firearms? Glad I am not California LE.

You know some of the prime targets (to turn in) are going to be that "crazy uncle Mike, who has way too many guns and looks at Alex Jones' website all day". This has potential to end badly for a lot of people on the pointy end of enforcement.

And when someone does inevitability shoot agents of the state, they will point to it and say, "See. He was dangerous. It's a good thing we are here to take guns away from unstable people like this."

To the gun grabbers it will simply self-justify their position even further.

 

[RobbyMaQ]

Wake up.

In fact we were years ahead of California: The Indiana Law Blog: Ind. Law - Judge uses "new law" to take guns from Carmel man [Updated]

I'm hoping the evidence needed (in our version) goes above & beyond the 'he said/she said' CA requirement.

 

[halfmileharry]

Yes, Harry, the problem with that is ..... "they" don't let ME decide WHO the domestic enemies ARE !!!!!

They will clearly show their hand. We're getting glimpses now.

 

[Tryin']

And when someone does inevitability shoot agents of the state, they will point to it and say, "See. He was dangerous. It's a good thing we are here to take guns away from unstable people like this."

To the gun grabbers it will simply self-justify their position even further.

True. But the gun grabbers won't be doing the taking. You start getting a few guys shot every other time you go to this, enforcement starts to look like a losing proposition.

I am not saying that will happen, and I am CERTAINLY not hoping for it, but think of how much different prior societal overreaches would have been if a few less enforcers came back every raid. Gulag Archipelago, anyone?

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”
― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

 

[printcraft]

This is were The Blob starts........ everybody remember what happens next?

 

[T.Lex]

Wake up.

In fact we were years ahead of California: The Indiana Law Blog: Ind. Law - Judge uses "new law" to take guns from Carmel man [Updated]

haha

Well, I'm hitting snooze, then, because that was not anything like gun confiscation. I thought INGO wanted guns out of the hands of mentally ill and dangerous people (like muslims) for self-protection.

 

[KG1]

I think the OP might wanna consider changing his screen name. <--- purple

 

[BugI02]

What? No - of course I don't have guns with no paper trail stashed at my bugout cabin. What do you think I am, crazy?

 

[SnoopLoggyDog]

I can see this being used as a preemptive strike by a vindictive spouse filing for divorce, or a spurned lover after a breakup. SWATing by SJWs also comes to mind. Just imagine the power a grumpy neighbor or deceitful co-worker/employee now has. They can now deliver through a false accusation, a mountain of pain, frustration and piles of legal fees, because they know you own firearms. We are now living in a world of pre-crime where guilt is automatic, despite the facts.

 

[BlackGun]

Guilty until proven innocent. Another attack on the Constitution. Another reason that I am glad I don't live in California.

So am I

 

[Principal Skinr]

Wake me when Indiana starts adopting California-style gun laws.

At a certain level, I feel bad for Californians. And yet, not really.

I feel badly for the Californian gun owners. They are not the ones who elected these bozos. They are the victims of the liberal majority there.

 

[cbhausen]

I feel badly for the Californian gun owners. They are not the ones who elected these bozos. They are the victims of the liberal majority there.

Then move the hell out. Let the makers leave the tax base of the takers. Starve the ravenous beast to death. It's happening already.

 

[BugI02]

I can see this being used as a preemptive strike by a vindictive spouse filing for divorce, or a spurned lover after a breakup. SWATing by SJWs also comes to mind. Just imagine the power a grumpy neighbor or deceitful co-worker/employee now has. They can now deliver through a false accusation, a mountain of pain, frustration and piles of legal fees, because they know you own firearms. We are now living in a world of pre-crime where guilt is automatic, despite the facts.

Kinda sounds like a 'no - fly' list for gun owners, doesn't it.

 

[halfmileharry]

Then move the hell out. Let the makers leave the tax base of the takers. Starve the ravenous beast to death. It's happening already.

In theory it's good. In reality the Federal Govt. (US Taxpayers) will bail them out and we'll be stuck with another bill

 

[Cygnus]

I thought there was a "due process" clause, somewhere, in something called the Constitution, and one cannot be deprived

of property, w/o due process .....

Dude...That stuff was like 200 years ago...Pfffttttt,

 

[henktermaat]

http://youtube.com/watch?v=DNDcd1Fe5lg

applicable.