To be fair, I don't know that David has an "anti-gun agenda". I also don't know that he does not. All I know is that his posts in general tend to lean less toward individual liberty than, say, yours, mine, or most people's hereabouts.
In and of itself, that doesn't make him anti-gun, but perhaps anti-individualist/anti-individual rights.
Regardless, and unrelated to exclusively him or for that matter, exclusively you, let's keep the posts on topic, and off of each other. It's not about "his kind", whatever that is, but about the proponents of this move (requiring stores to waste retail space on a specific item that they otherwise would not stock.)
Statism and liberalism both contain ideas that their adherents think are so good, they (the ideas) should be mandatory.
Blessings,
Bill
In and of itself, that doesn't make him anti-gun, but perhaps anti-individualist/anti-individual rights.
Regardless, and unrelated to exclusively him or for that matter, exclusively you, let's keep the posts on topic, and off of each other. It's not about "his kind", whatever that is, but about the proponents of this move (requiring stores to waste retail space on a specific item that they otherwise would not stock.)
Statism and liberalism both contain ideas that their adherents think are so good, they (the ideas) should be mandatory.
Blessings,
Bill
Nobody wants to stock items that won't sell. Retail is all about dollars per square foot, and taking up display space with something you can't sell costs you money. If we allow this, the gun stores will eventually be forced to stock more and more crap that won't sell eventually forcing them out of business, which although unstated is the likely goal. Your kind is all about incremental destruction of the gun industry in this country; we all know it. You aren't fooling anyone into supporting your anti-gun agenda.