Wouldn't that be a vote for second focal plane?FFP because I don't make really far shots and the larger reticle is nice even at low power.
Yep, I screw that up all the time.Wouldn't that be a vote for second focal plane?
Welcome to Indiana S12. I'm glad to have another shooter in the Hoosier State.I am relatively new here to Indiana and the Midwest. I spent the last 7 years in New Mexico where 350 yards seemed to be about the average shot, but it was not uncommon to find opportunities are limited by distance quickly. On my hunting rifles there my priorities were tracking repeatability, and weight, with just about everything else coming in lower. I found that most lightweight hunting scopes are second focal plane, and I did not have an issue as I dial for elevation and if the shot is long enough to need windage holds then I will be at the max magnification and the subtensions will be accurate. My favorite hunting scope for out west is Leupold VX5-HD 3-15x44 at 19.7 ounces, it's a sweet scope. But I have a couple Zeiss Conquest V4s because of sales and availability once upon a time, and I like them ok too, nothing to complain about. Also while hunting with SFP at low magnification your reticle is still easily visible and if you need to bring the rifle up for something closer and quick you don't have a super tiny hair reticle.
I find it more useful to have first focal plane scope for long range target shooting, or PRS when jumping from one target to another quickly you always have the option to use the reticle at any magnification and if you happen to be shooting long range without a spotter you can zoom out a little to get a larger field of view to spot your misses easier.
Here’s a picture of my wife in October 2021 in NM Elk season. Shot was just over 300 yards the rifle was Christensen Arms Ridgeline bedded with Score High Bedding compound, topped with a Zeiss Conquest V4 shooting a 212 ELD-X w/ H1000 @ 2950 FPS
View attachment 267389