Reading this article drive my thinking to where I have a question on the whole concept of “common use” by the courts. Why are machine guns not considered “common use”? Are they not commonly owned and commonly taxed? Are they not as common as they can be since the government banned the sale of new ones?
So the government can declare a gun cannot be sold then gets to ban it because it is not ”common use” because of government restrictions? The government is playing heads I win, tails you lose, kind of game…
So the government can declare a gun cannot be sold then gets to ban it because it is not ”common use” because of government restrictions? The government is playing heads I win, tails you lose, kind of game…