13 state AGs threaten suit over health care deal

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • jedi

    Da PinkFather
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    51   0   0
    Oct 27, 2008
    37,863
    113
    NWI, North of US-30
    It' 1/4 of the STATES but perhaps the other states grow some and jump on this and finally kick the FEDs butt! We are not BTW one of the states that jumped on this.

    SOURCE: 13 state AGs threaten suit over health care deal - Yahoo! News

    OLUMBIA, S.C. – Republican attorneys general in 13 states say congressional leaders must remove Nebraska's political deal from the federal health care reform bill or face legal action, according to a letter provided to The Associated Press Wednesday.
    "We believe this provision is constitutionally flawed," South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster and the 12 other attorneys general wrote in the letter to be sent Wednesday night to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
    "As chief legal officers of our states we are contemplating a legal challenge to this provision and we ask you to take action to render this challenge unnecessary by striking that provision," they wrote.
    In a rare Christmas Eve vote, Senate Democrats pushed sweeping health care legislation to the brink of Senate passage, crushing a year-end Republican filibuster against President Barack Obama's call to remake the nation's health care system. The 60-39 vote marked the third time in as many days Democrats posted a supermajority needed to advance the legislation.
    The letter was signed by top prosecutors in Alabama, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Michigan, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia and Washington state. All are Republicans, and McMaster and the attorneys general of Florida, Michigan and Pennsylvania are running for governor in their respective states.
    Last week, McMaster said he was leading several other attorneys general in an inquiry into the constitutionality of the estimated $100 million deal he has dubbed the "Cornhusker Kickback."
    Republican U.S. Sens. Lindsey Graham and Jim DeMint of South Carolina raised questions about the legislation, which they said was amended to win Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson's support.
    "Because this provision has serious implications for the country and the future of our nation's legislative process, we urge you to take appropriate steps to protect the Constitution and the rights of the citizens of our nation," the attorneys general wrote.
    A conference committee begins meeting next year to work out a compromise between House and Senate versions of the bill. Experts expect those talks will likely last into February.
    McMaster says if the bill goes through to final approval with the benefit to Nebraska, taxpayers in the other 49 states will have to pay for it.
    House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn, D-S.C., said the letter was a political ploy.
    "This threat stinks of partisan politics," he said in a statement. "If Henry McMaster wants to write federal law he should run for Congress not governor."
    Meanwhile, Nelson is taking his message on health care reform directly to his constituents. In a television ad beginning during Wednesday night's Nebraska-Arizona Holiday Bowl football game, the Democrat says he stuck by his principles throughout the debate and doesn't want Nebraskans to be confused on his position.
    While it's not uncommon for states to challenge federal laws in court, one legal expert said political bluster was likely behind the letter.
    "I do think that it is some combination of the losers just complaining about the officiating, or complaining about how the game was played, in combination with trying to make the bill look as seedy and inappropriate as possible, for political purposes," says Andy Siegel, a former University of South Carolina School of Law professor now teaching at Seattle University School of Law.
    "It is smart politics to try to tarnish it and make it look less like an achievement and more like some sort of corrupted bargain," he said.
     

    45calibre

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    18   0   0
    Jul 28, 2008
    3,204
    38
    NWI
    This kind of leads me to believe that for the most part the states ARE for the people its just the fed we gotta worry about.
     

    Lars

    Rifleman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 6, 2008
    4,342
    38
    Cedar Creek, TX
    There was another angle that I heard Texas was going to take above and beyond the above. The above I believe is based on the 14th Amendment.

    Texas's Governor was also looking at the possibility of a 10th Amendment case.


    Time to write to Governor Daniels, and Greg Zoeller to ask them to get on board.
    Unfortunately the States can't file any legal action until the bill is final, and signed into law by The President.

    Office of the Indiana Attorney General
    Indiana Government Center South
    302 W. Washington St.
    Indianapolis, IN 46204
    Phone: 317.232.6201
    Fax: 317.232.7979

    E-mail: Constituent@atg.in.gov

    Governor Daniels:
    By Phone: 317-232-4567
    By Mail:
    Office of the Governor
    Statehouse
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2797
     

    wtfd661

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Dec 27, 2008
    6,468
    63
    North East Indiana
    Indiana needs to get in on this. I've (along with everyone else not in Nebraska) thought that was a bunch of crap buying a Senator for $100 million, I'm sure they could have gotten him for a lot less :xmad:.
     
    Top Bottom