Debated whether this belonged here or in politics. Decided more carry related than political per se so put it here. Mods feel free to move it if you disagree with that assessment.
Here's the situation: you park your car in a commercial parking lot. You will be open carrying from there to somewhere else (say, an open carry political protest ).
Case one: You've just parked and step out of your car with a handgun visible in a holster at your side. Someone apparently involved in the operation of the garager says you can't have the gun in there and asks you to leave. I presume that at this point you don't really have any recourse but to eat whatever the minimum parking charge is. Correct?
Case two: Nobody said anything when you got out of the car and went about your business but now on returning someone objects and asks you to leave at the entrance. You're out here. You've been asked to leave. Your car is in there. Now what do you do? Does the trespass law allow them to prevent you from entering their property in order to retrieve your property which was legally present there at least up until that point?
Case two is the more important of the two cases, as you might imagine.
Here's the situation: you park your car in a commercial parking lot. You will be open carrying from there to somewhere else (say, an open carry political protest ).
Case one: You've just parked and step out of your car with a handgun visible in a holster at your side. Someone apparently involved in the operation of the garager says you can't have the gun in there and asks you to leave. I presume that at this point you don't really have any recourse but to eat whatever the minimum parking charge is. Correct?
Case two: Nobody said anything when you got out of the car and went about your business but now on returning someone objects and asks you to leave at the entrance. You're out here. You've been asked to leave. Your car is in there. Now what do you do? Does the trespass law allow them to prevent you from entering their property in order to retrieve your property which was legally present there at least up until that point?
Case two is the more important of the two cases, as you might imagine.