Another loser that knows nothing about...

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • esrice

    Certified Regular Guy
    Rating - 100%
    20   0   0
    Jan 16, 2008
    24,095
    48
    Indy
    I would like to see one in person. To me it looks more of a hindrance than an aid. I could see that thing getting snagged on all kinds of stuff...

    For you and me maybe. But if it allows someone to carry and manipulate a superior weapon system then I'd be all for it. (assuming racking was the only hindrance)
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    Only that sons, husbands, boyfriends, etc., might be better served allowing an impartial third party instruct the women in their lives.

    Is that so they can be growled at when necessary without YOU being the one in the doghouse for the indefinite future?
     

    jeremy

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Feb 18, 2008
    16,482
    36
    Fiddler's Green
    For you and me maybe. But if it allows someone to carry and manipulate a superior weapon system then I'd be all for it. (assuming racking was the only hindrance)
    I think we are tracking on the device. That is part of the reason I would like to see one in person...
     

    Blackhawk2001

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jun 20, 2010
    8,199
    113
    NW Indianapolis
    SO according to this "idiots" "logic" @ 7:58 I can shoot my "piece" like this:

    thugsidewayspistolaim.jpg


    And drop fools all day long, since "stance and "grip" don't have sh** to do with accuracy.

    FAILURE GO BACK TO YOUR HOLE

    At CP Atterbury, when we qualified with our pistols (M9), we had to turn in every piece of brass. Even though the range aprons are largely concrete and stone, it's a real pain to try to police up the brass after every firing round. Once I had gained a bit of confidence with the M9, I started canting the pistol to eject the brass closer to my firing position, making it somewhat easier to find afterwards. Yeah, I took some ribbing for "gansta" shooting, but it didn't affect my accuracy noticeably. Once you get away from the "approved stance" firing situations, ensuring that the barrel is pointed at the place you want to hit when the bullet leaves it is the only thing that truly matters in hitting a target.
     

    Shay

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    18   0   0
    Mar 17, 2008
    2,364
    48
    Indy
    Once you get away from the "approved stance" firing situations, ensuring that the barrel is pointed at the place you want to hit when the bullet leaves it is the only thing that truly matters in hitting a target.

    What you just wrote is so simple, isn't it. And yet there are some here who refuse to believe it.
     

    churchmouse

    I still care....Really
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    187   0   0
    Dec 7, 2011
    191,809
    152
    Speedway area
    We did live fire with the grip described by Jeramy yesterday. I found it does work for me with the Glock style triggers (long take up) but I did have to change my stance. It did not improve anything when shooting a 1911 at least for me. My son and son in law struggled a bit at first but they seem to do a bit better with that grip.
    Yes, it is all in having the barrel on point when the round leaves it.
     
    Top Bottom