Another thought that just crossed my mind about the whole "intimidation" factor and the article specifically saying "men with loaded rifles".
I was asked by a reporter if my rifle was loaded, I said yes. Apparently this came as a surprise to him. If he expected and thought it to be unloaded, I can only presume that was the common opinion of most there. This statement aired on the news well after the rally was over. How can someone feel intimidated by something that happened in the past? How does that work? Is there such thing as retro-active intimidation?
I was asked by a reporter if my rifle was loaded, I said yes. Apparently this came as a surprise to him. If he expected and thought it to be unloaded, I can only presume that was the common opinion of most there. This statement aired on the news well after the rally was over. How can someone feel intimidated by something that happened in the past? How does that work? Is there such thing as retro-active intimidation?