Biden did not get charged in having documents because....he could not remember...anything. Such as asking when did he stop being vice president

[KLB]

I would not trust a constitution convention right now. No way.

Why? You think that something stupid is going to be passed by 3/4 of the states? All a convention could do is propose an Amendment.

Plus, it would more likely come through Congress like all of the previous Amendments.

 

[HoosierLife]

GOP Calls to Invoke 25th Amendment: Biden ‘Not Competent’ to Be President

Following a report revealing the deterioration of President Joe Biden’s mental state, the GOP is calling to invoke the 25th Amendment.

www.breitbart.com

 

[phylodog]

Why they bother to even attempt to cover up the corruption at this point boggles my mind.

 

[Old Road Dog]

Even CNN has turned. The question remains, who are the democrats putting in for the election?

"My Memory Is Fine" Biden Fumes, Before Confusing Egypt's Sisi With The President Of Mexico | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

The Obamas have been polling Major Democratic Donors judging interest in a Michelle Candidacy. Theory is Uncle Joe will withdraw his candidacy and release his Delegates sometime around May (before the DNC Convention in Chiraq) opening the door for Michelle. This would insure Barack's 4th (and perhaps 5th) term as POTUS. Another name being floated is Gretchen Witmer, Governor of Michigan. Newsom has too much Woke baggage to be taken seriously.
Greg Kelly from Newsmax broke down the report masterfully last night and raised the question: will a full transcript of Uncle Joe's 5 hour testimony be released to the public??

Michelle Obama 2024 - A Joel Gilbert Film and Best-Selling Book

Michelle Obama will run for President in 2024, and base her candidacy on a life story that is more racially divisive and very nearly as fictitious as that of her husband Barack.

www.michelleobama24.com

 

[printcraft]

Shameless two tiered justice.

Yep, 2 Americas and it’s not going to change.
I’m done participating in theirs.

 

[Shadow01]

It isn't a crime if you don't remember committing it.

Just like Hillary lacked intent so no crime committed.

 

[BehindBlueI's]

View attachment 331654

Presence of dementia does not contraindicate stupidity. You can be both.

 

[cobber]

View attachment 331658

Actually he claimed he’s competent, and then promptly passed the buck.

 

[JFriar96]

At the end of the day he isn't being charged and Trump is, that's what counts to the lawyers calling the plays. Feeble Joe or Junior Soprano, it's all in a days work for a dollar.

I agree completely. But on the flip end of it I believe they’re making 45 bulletproof. What can they do/say at this point to get anyone to turn on him?

 

[JFriar96]

Depends who your friends are.

Also depends on who’s in who’s pockets and how deep.

 

[Ziggidy]

Also depends on who’s in who’s pockets and how deep.

And Joe relies on “depends” ALLOT!

 

[BugI02]

I'm sure posting on here automatically disqualifies you from the special kind of immunity reserved for leftist politicos.[gets you put on a list somewhere, maybe several lists]

fixy

 

[Cameramonkey]

Why? You think that something stupid is going to be passed by 3/4 of the states? All a convention could do is propose an Amendment.

Plus, it would more likely come through Congress like all of the previous Amendments.

My understanding is that once the convention is convened, they can do whatever they want. Including voting on more than one amendment. I mean, worst case, They could call a "harmless" convention for changing the official bird to be the turkey instead of the bald eagle, but then decide to repeal the 2A while they are at it.

You can push that boulder down the hill to make a splash in the lake, but there is no guarantee it wont veer off course and smash your SUV parked near the lake on the way. So in one way, its a bit of a gamble.

 

[Tombs]

We have a minimum age for POTUS in the Constitution. Can we please get an effing amendment on a maximum as well?

Why?

Plenty of people go to the grave with their brain still in tact. We have the 25th amendment for cases where they aren't.

In the end, the buck stops with us. If we aren't going to be involved in the process and preventing nonsense like this, we can't hope to have a functional country.

 

[KLB]

My understanding is that once the convention is convened, they can do whatever they want. Including voting on more than one amendment. I mean, worst case, They could call a "harmless" convention for changing the official bird to be the turkey instead of the bald eagle, but then decide to repeal the 2A while they are at it.

You can push that boulder down the hill to make a splash in the lake, but there is no guarantee it wont veer off course and smash your SUV parked near the lake on the way. So in one way, its a bit of a gamble.

It still has to be ratified the same way. There is no getting around that. So you think that suddenly 3/4 of the States are going to vote to repeal the 2nd Amendment?

 

[BehindBlueI's]

Why?

Plenty of people go to the grave with their brain still in tact. We have the 25th amendment for cases where they aren't.

In the end, the buck stops with us. If we aren't going to be involved in the process and preventing nonsense like this, we can't hope to have a functional country.

For the same reason there's a minimum age. Basic mental compentency isn't the bar I would hope for in POTUS.

 

[Cameramonkey]

It still has to be ratified the same way. There is no getting around that. So you think that suddenly 3/4 of the States are going to vote to repeal the 2nd Amendment?

You missed the point. Take a breath and read this slowly:
You can convene the convention for x, but once they are there, they are not REQUIRED to ONLY vote on x and nothing more. They could get a wild hair and decide to ALSO do something else. ANYTHING else.

THEY ARE NOT BOUND/RESTRICTED TO ONLY DO THE STATED BUSINESS THAT YOU SENT THEM THERE TO DO IN THE FIRST PLACE. THEY CAN GO ABOVE AND BEYOND THE ORIGINAL STATED INTENT. Not likely, but possible. Caveat Emptor.

I mean, I could be extra hyperbolic and say they could also decide to repeal the 1st, 4th, and 5th amendments while they are at it if they please. Not likely, but possible legally.

Just be careful what you wish for. You may not get what you expected.

 

[Ingomike]

I mean, I could be extra hyperbolic and say they could also decide to repeal the 1st, 4th, and 5th amendments while they are at it if they please. Not likely, but possible legally.

They would definitely amend the first if they could to have a list of exclusions to it, namely that one cannot say anything that offends others while they repeal the second. This is not speculative, they say so…

 

[KLB]

You missed the point. Take a breath and read this slowly:
You can convene the convention for x, but once they are there, they are not REQUIRED to ONLY vote on x and nothing more. They could get a wild hair and decide to ALSO do something else. ANYTHING else.

THEY ARE NOT BOUND/RESTRICTED TO ONLY DO THE STATED BUSINESS THAT YOU SENT THEM THERE TO DO IN THE FIRST PLACE. THEY CAN GO ABOVE AND BEYOND THE ORIGINAL STATED INTENT. Not likely, but possible. Caveat Emptor.

I mean, I could be extra hyperbolic and say they could also decide to repeal the 1st, 4th, and 5th amendments while they are at it if they please. Not likely, but possible legally.

Just be careful what you wish for. You may not get what you expected.

I really don't understand the angst. They can propose any of that, but they do not actually pass any Amendments. This is not a case of them getting together to pass an Amendment. They get together to propose Amendments, which then go to the State's to get approved. 3/4 of the State's then have to approve it.

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.[3]

 

[Ingomike]

I really don't understand the angst. They can propose any of that, but they do not actually pass any Amendments. This is not a case of them getting together to pass an Amendment. They get together to propose Amendments, which then go to the State's to get approved. 3/4 of the State's then have to approve it.

I think the concern is that the second will be gutted, a few well timed FBI guided shootings will occur, the sheeple will be stampeded into this and more once the process is started. There have been no amendments in most of our lives. We have been in a period where no one believes the political will to amend the constitution exists, but prove it can be and they will go nuts on it…