I thought someone was questioning the part where they shot a non-combatant in his home and dumped his body in the ocean.
I thought someone was questioning the part where they shot a non-combatant in his home and dumped his body in the ocean.
it's almost like being institutionalized in prison.He's had enough happen to him he should be able to get compensation. I'm collecting from the BS I went through. I couldn't talk about a lot of stuff because there's no official AAR that they can get at the VA. But I guarantee he can get coverage. Hell I just through a letter in the trash about SGLI vendors even though I'm out. You can still get the stuff dirt cheap compared to civilians. I feel bad for the guy about work. Everyone from my platoon is screwed in that area. Most stayed in because they saw how bad it was for some of us. I'm stuck carrying a gun and body armor for the rest of my life because I have no transferable skill set other than making people dead and being sneaky. Can't be a cop because my back is destroyed and I have a very short temper quite often. I should've never took the option of getting out, but I would've hated pushing a desk because I was messed up.
I thought someone was questioning the part where they shot a non-combatant in his home and dumped his body in the ocean.
it's almost like being institutionalized in prison.
Am I wrong for having doubts? Just read the official story. So it goes, the team went into Pakistan (not a warzone, btw), and broke into a Pakistani's house. There they found an occupant (allegedly Osama Bin Laden) hiding behind a woman. The occupant was not resisting in any way or acting aggressive (on record). They got within "10 inches of his head", shot him in the skull and twice more in the body. Then they took the body and dumped it in the ocean.Is a general a 'non combatant' because he doesn't personally pull the trigger? He was anything but a non-combatant.
I'm calling BS on this one Rambone.
Also how do you know what they really did with him?
This is the official government story.
Now that assassinations are acceptable and officially extended to U.S. citizens
would/should a U.S. citizen who fought for the Axis have been hands off?
It's one thing to shoot someone on the battlefield, but it's a totally different thing to hit someone (a 16 yr old at that) with a hellfire missile while he's not engaged in any terrorist activity.
Sets a ****ty precedent. Then there's also that thing called "due process".
Additionally, we also don't firebomb or nuke civilian populations anymore, so your comparison is a moot point.
Fixed it for ya!I thought someone was questioning the part where they shot a illegal-combatant in his home and dumped his body in the ocean.