Brass Vs. Steel in AR-15

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • SpaldingPM

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Mar 22, 2013
    1,367
    48
    Direct quote from the study...
    "As indicated by accuracy testing, the steel cased/bimetal jacketed ammunition caused accelerated wear to the inside of their respective bores. While the barrel of the Federal carbine had plenty of life left, even after 10,000 rounds at extremely high rates of fire, the Wolf and Brown Bear barrels were subjected to the same rates of fire and were completely “shot out” by 6,000 rounds.

    At the end of the test, the chrome lining of the Wolf and Brown Bear barrels was almost gone from the throat forward, and the barrels had effectively become smoothbores, with the rifling near the muzzles acting only as a mild suggestion on the projectiles. A throat erosion gauge could be dropped into the bore from the muzzle end with absolutely no resistance."
     

    Tanfodude

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 25, 2012
    3,892
    83
    4 Seasons
    Direct quote from the study...
    "As indicated by accuracy testing, the steel cased/bimetal jacketed ammunition caused accelerated wear to the inside of their respective bores. While the barrel of the Federal carbine had plenty of life left, even after 10,000 rounds at extremely high rates of fire, the Wolf and Brown Bear barrels were subjected to the same rates of fire and were completely “shot out” by 6,000 rounds.

    At the end of the test, the chrome lining of the Wolf and Brown Bear barrels was almost gone from the throat forward, and the barrels had effectively become smoothbores, with the rifling near the muzzles acting only as a mild suggestion on the projectiles. A throat erosion gauge could be dropped into the bore from the muzzle end with absolutely no resistance."

    That's what I said, depending how you're shooting them. On that test, I seriously doubt that a recreational shooter would encounter such problem. On that test, at the rate and time they're firing, then yes, it'll have that effect.

    But to say that it is totally bad to use steel case on an AR, I mean come on. Those who say that they're really bad are probably shooting 5K rounds in span of minutes. Not everyone has that extra dough to flush, but if they do, good for them.

    This is from a guy with DI, carbine length gas system with stock carbine buffer and buffer spring.
     

    SpaldingPM

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Mar 22, 2013
    1,367
    48
    That's what I said, depending how you're shooting them. On that test, I seriously doubt that a recreational shooter would encounter such problem. On that test, at the rate and time they're firing, then yes, it'll have that effect.

    But to say that it is totally bad to use steel case on an AR, I mean come on. Those who say that they're really bad are probably shooting 5K rounds in span of minutes. Not everyone has that extra dough to flush, but if they do, good for them.

    This is from a guy with DI, carbine length gas system with stock carbine buffer and buffer spring.


    I don't think you're getting what all I've said...?
    I mentioned through this whole thread how steel is all I personally use, how any small negatives of using it, far outweigh paying for brass. I'm just going off facts that have been proven not only in this study but a few others I've seen. Its a fact that steel is more harsh on the contact area of the AR15, especially when its rubbing at 2800fps 5000x. No matter how you choose to shoot... whether its 5000x in 1hr or 5000x in 10yrs... you compare that side to side to a barrel you've shot a softer copper jacketed projectile in, the barrel that used steel will be more worn.

    No one ever said steel is bad though. I don't know where you're getting that? Why would I say steel is bad when I shoot it?
     

    Tanfodude

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 25, 2012
    3,892
    83
    4 Seasons
    I don't think you're getting what all I've said...?
    I mentioned through this whole thread how steel is all I personally use, how any small negatives of using it, far outweigh paying for brass. I'm just going off facts that have been proven not only in this study but a few others I've seen. Its a fact that steel is more harsh on the contact area of the AR15, especially when its rubbing at 2800fps 5000x. No matter how you choose to shoot... whether its 5000x in 1hr or 5000x in 10yrs... you compare that side to side to a barrel you've shot a softer copper jacketed projectile in, the barrel that used steel will be more worn.

    No one ever said steel is bad though. I don't know where you're getting that? Why would I say steel is bad when I shoot it?

    My bad, I apologize, on the 2nd paragraph, I wasn't referring to you. I was referring to those people who were saying how really bad steel cased ammo is to the AR is. And for steel cased ammo to have problems on AR, that must be some ****ty ass AR.

    I agree with you and that study itself, no arguments there. But to a recreational/occasional shooter, it's a different story.
     

    Beowulf

    Master
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Mar 21, 2012
    2,880
    83
    Brownsburg
    My bad, I apologize, on the 2nd paragraph, I wasn't referring to you. I was referring to those people who were saying how really bad steel cased ammo is to the AR is. And for steel cased ammo to have problems on AR, that must be some ****ty ass AR.

    I agree with you and that study itself, no arguments there. But to a recreational/occasional shooter, it's a different story.

    I used to think that as well, but I've had cases get stuck in both cheaply built franken-ARs, as well as a $1000+ rifles. It's one of the reasons I've more or less given up on the AR platform (though the Stag Arms M8T, being a piston driven AR at right at the $1000 mark has me tempted). Of all the ARs I've owned, only one has not had a steel case get stuck and that was a pre-ban Colt A2 HBAR Sporter, which I sold a while back.

    Honestly, though, with the ammo crisis and the introduction of cheaper Wolf brass (and some deals on reloaded), I've been able to buy 1k of brass .223 for only about $50 more than steel, so for the time being, I've more or less stopped buying steel at all (though I will occasionally pick up some at Walmart if there is some there and there isn't a caliber I want more).
     

    SpaldingPM

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Mar 22, 2013
    1,367
    48
    My bad, I apologize, on the 2nd paragraph, I wasn't referring to you. I was referring to those people who were saying how really bad steel cased ammo is to the AR is. And for steel cased ammo to have problems on AR, that must be some ****ty ass AR.

    I agree with you and that study itself, no arguments there. But to a recreational/occasional shooter, it's a different story.

    Ohhh ok haha. I agree full heartedly that it is perfect for a recreational shoot. I'd rather throw quarters away instead of two quarters, everytime I pull the trigger!

    Out of all the steel case ammo, Wolf has got to be my favorite, followed by that new monarch stuff. Pretty decent. I hate tula. I find the cases extremely weak (my extractor has ripped a rim off before, and I have friends who stove pipe frequently due to that), and I occasionally have a round that has a primer not seated correctly, or has been completely reversed! 3 times I even opened a box to find a russian surplus 5.45 in there! How the hell does that happen?

    I love steel, but Tula lacks some serious QC imo.
     

    ol' Huff

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 8, 2012
    567
    28
    Surprised no one had mentioned the Wolf PA shoot at Atterbury. +/- 20k rounds downrange without malfunction and several shooters putting up 1 to 1.5 MOA groups. All with steel.
     

    SpaldingPM

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Mar 22, 2013
    1,367
    48

    I personally wouldn't because of the issues I've mentioned before in the thread... no fires due to mis-seated primers or dud primes all together, stove pipes due to the extractor ripping the rim if the case off... those are catastrophic failures... if a round stove pipes during a gun fight... you're done for.
    Tula is especially notorious for stove pipes.
     

    PKendall317

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 23, 2012
    939
    16
    Mooresville, IN
    I've probably shot close to 1.2k- 1.3k rounds through my AR using Tula and have never had an issue and have only cleaned my rifle once after about the 1k mark and still no issues. I still keep a few hundred rounds of brass around for a rainy day or when I can afford it but Tula is my default for now and it seems to work pretty well even though it's dirty and smells like crap.
     
    Top Bottom