Twangbanger
Grandmaster
- Oct 9, 2010
- 7,111
- 113
or... perhaps... this was never as bad as it was claimed to be
. perhaps some anecdotes of severe illness were believed to be typical and repeated time and again.
yes, not putting people on vents seemed to improve outcomes. they are using convalescent plasma also, transfusing antibodies from previously infected patients into the critically ill.
but ultimately I think what happened is massive population centers like NYC has been burned out and has high immunity levels. other places were never going to by NYC or Italy and had some bumps as expected. what we are seeing now isn't less severe illness. it's the same illness just in less dense petri dishes.
and T.Lex, it's called "rafting" together, not hooking . though I'm convinced some hooking occurs while rafting
I just hope the doctors get the credit, not the politicians. But you know who's going to be first at the microphone...
Doc, I'd like to know your opinion on something. How much do you think the tone of our response has been affected by the initial pants-sh!tting paper published by the Imperial College of London med people, theorizing about "asymptomatic transmission" and the possibility of the virus staying live on surfaces for 9 days, was that based on looking at lies from China, etc.? It certainly seems like not much changed as a result of it. We turned the world upside down, the people who were always going to die, died anyway, and here we are.