Dayton and El Paso..............two leftist emasculated dweebs that wouldn't change their views to become successful.
Champions of diversity............their kind supposed to be heroes.
Society didn't accept that, so they became villians.
Incels.
Heard Beta Male applied...................these A holes were not "satellite bulls".
No hierarchy change over time.
If anything, these types are ANTIFA more than anything else.
Thing is, one can be a loser and still score chicks, hot ones.......my neighbor did and he's a friggin weirdo/loser.
But he put forth a bit of effort LOL.
Chicks like losers, bad boys, or ones they can mother.
Just plain A holes...............nope.
Yeah, but who wouldn't?
[video=youtube;yWcVoX0QDyA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWcVoX0QDyA[/video]
The secondary suits will will be filled on the former Vikings !
Hey now...
There is a reason the Irish have red hair and it didn't come from the Druids.
Was at the L G S today. Several A-R's and plenty of .223/5.56 available ... Nice lil blonde walked in. Left with a brand new RUGER LC9 and a hunert rounds!!!!!So...when does the market run on guns begin?
Was at the L G S today. Several A-R's and plenty of .223/5.56 available ... Nice lil blonde walked in. Left with a brand new RUGER LC9 and a hunert rounds!!!!!
Yes. Pretty much.He stated in the first paragraph that he was in effect taking action to stop the cultural and ethnic replacement instigated by the Hispanic invasion.
Would that be racist or identitarian?
I’m assuming by identitarian his goal would be to preserve a distinct American identity , culture and the country’s resources for Americans.
if that’s the case there are a lot of people that want the same thing but aren’t crazy enough to start killing Hispanics to achieve that goal.
This lunatic blew through the stop sign and took it to far and people died because of it.
In THIS context, it’s clear that it’s identitarian. And I’m not saying that he’s not a racist. I’m saying that I don’t see an indication that what was in the manifesto makes him a racist in the traditional definition. In other words, I’m not inferring assumptions not in evidence.We used to have a policy here, called "Separate but Equal." Would you call that policy racist or identitarian? And no, he DID kill people because of their race, as I'm not so sure one can determine who is an immigrant and who is a citizen simply by looking at them for the time it take to squeeze a trigger.
To my thinking basing a view of someone solely upon their membership to an ethnic group is racist. This might be overly simplified but I don't see a reason to complicate the issue here.
Doug
He advocates racial purity for everyone. Not just his."This attack is in response to the Hispanic Invasion of Texas." ....... "I am defending my country from the cultural and ethnic replacement brought on by an Invasion."
A few questions:
Which culture and ethnicity, specifically ethnicity, is he speaking about being replaced?
Does he associate Hispanics with having a negative impact on society due to immigration?
American whites are the most intermixed mutts. Blacks likewise. I do not know about Asians or other immigrants.
My dad was 100% Scottish (who knows how much Roman, Viking, Celt, Spanish &c. went into that makeup) my mom was mostly German (who knows what went into that makeup).
I call myself American (of Scottish and German descent). My wife, who knows she is from Kentucky (could be 100% familial pure). She has been told, English, Irish, Cherokee and who knows what else. One daughter married a supposedly 100% Minnesotan descendant of northern Europeans. The others, I have no idea of their heritage and It does not matter.
I may be mistaken, but I do not think that Blacks in America worry about genealogies when they marry.
There is no racial purity in America.
At the rate that I see marriages between people who do not care about color match in my own Church it will not be many generations before we can put this argument behind us. My daddy told me when I was a wee lad that this would occur.
He was all for it.