EXECUTIVE ORDER MAY BAN PRIVATE GUN TRANSFERS

[trucker777]

http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/717821

 

[BogWalker]

Old news. Ended up a bunch of feel good fluff that did nothing. Carry on.

Article just tries to play up what ifs. While the points brought up are legitimate worries it's nothing to panic about at the moment.

 

[trucker777]

Old news. Ended up a bunch of feel good fluff that did nothing. Carry on.

Article just tries to play up what ifs. While the points brought up are legitimate worries it's nothing to panic about at the moment.

True, & I am worried. I just wanted to remind my fellow INGO'ers of what's at stake.

 

[indyjohn]

True, & I am worried. I just wanted to remind my fellow INGO'ers of what's at stake.

And IMHO, no harm in making sure we are paying attention.

 

[Jeremy032]

So when a few people dislike something is it going to become or continue to be the standard to simply ban it? Why can't these politicians learn to ignore these anti gunner groups that have no idea what they are talking about the same way they ignore that a constitution was written. So tired of these anti gun groups and politicians raping the media every chance they get to spread their anti gun propaganda, it's about as annoying as the annual door bell ring from the Jahova Witnesses.

 

[JettaKnight]

There's nothing here that hasn't been debated ad nauseum here on INGO. Someone either missed the original go-around or is trying to whip more tin-foilery.


Also, I believe that article mentioned the lifetime carry permit is going away.

 

[printcraft]

Good to stay on top of it regardless.

Get ready for 4 more years of this bull**** on an almost daily basis.

 

[chipbennett]

An Executive Order cannot ban/prohibit the private transfer of firearms, because such a ban/prohibition would be a direct and explicit violation of federal law.

 

[Bill of Rights]

An Executive Order cannot ban/prohibit the private transfer of firearms, because such a ban/prohibition would be a direct and explicit violation of federal law.

Since when has that mattered?

 

[chipbennett]

Since when has that mattered?

While I won't argue against EOs that have violated the principle of separation of powers, are there any examples of enacted EOs that explicitly violate federal law?