Feinstein, Obama to Continue Push for Gun, Magazine Ban; Magpul Stands Firm with

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • IN50

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 25, 2013
    67
    8
    Southern Indiana

    On Monday, the Senate announced that Sen. Dianne Feinstein's(D-Calif.) gun and magazine ban legislation (S. 150) will not be a part of theSenate’s base gun control bill, but that Feinstein will be allowed to offer itas an amendment to the gun control bill, the primary element of which is aproposal by Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) that would criminalize the privatetransfer of firearms between law-abiding Americans. The legislation is expectedto be considered the week of April 8.

    Feinstein’s legislation, which proposes to ban nearly every semi-automaticshotgun and detachable-magazine semi-automatic rifle, several other categoriesof firearms, and any ammunition magazine holding 11 or more rounds, will not beincluded in the Senate’s gun control bill at the outset, out of concern that itwould decrease the chance of Schumer’s legislation being approved.

    Also aimed at boosting Schumer’s effort, New York City Nanny-in-Chief MichaelBloomberg’s anti-gun group, MAIG, is running an ad showing a few lawenforcement agency employees, who are supposed to impartially enforce lawsadopted by legislatures, instead saying they “demand” that Congress pass thelaw that Schumer is proposing. As Bloomberg said today--not while ranting aboutguns, large soda pops, greasy hamburgers, or the retail display of cigarettepacks, but commenting on the inevitability of drones in America’sskies--“everybody everybody demagogues on all these things.”

    NRA-ILA GRASSROOTS ALERT: Vol. 20, No. 1203/22/2013
     

    cobber

    Parrot Daddy
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    44   0   0
    Sep 14, 2011
    10,281
    149
    Somewhere over the rainbow
    On Monday, the Senate announced that Sen. Dianne Feinstein's(D-Calif.) gun and magazine ban legislation (S. 150) will not be a part of theSenate’s base gun control bill, but that Feinstein will be allowed to offer itas an amendment to the gun control bill, the primary element of which is aproposal by Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) that would criminalize the privatetransfer of firearms between law-abiding Americans. The legislation is expectedto be considered the week of April 8.

    Feinstein’s legislation, which proposes to ban nearly every semi-automaticshotgun and detachable-magazine semi-automatic rifle, several other categoriesof firearms, and any ammunition magazine holding 11 or more rounds, will not beincluded in the Senate’s gun control bill at the outset, out of concern that itwould decrease the chance of Schumer’s legislation being approved.
    [edit]

    Bloomberg is truly an enemy of liberty in so many ways.

    Unfortunately for Feinstein, Andrew Cuomo jumped the gun with his draconian act that gave us all a view where this is headed.

    Actually non-NYers should give kudos to Cuomo for triggering the trip-wire.
     

    seabassz

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 24, 2013
    43
    6
    Just because it was taken out for consideration, at least part will be added back in throughout the process. I'm guessing the mag limit is the most feasible to add back in once the Senate confirms universal background checks.
     

    BogWalker

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jan 5, 2013
    6,305
    63
    You know what we should all do if any of this is passed? Ignore it totally! What would they do if 80 million people just ignore the new laws? 80 million angry, coordinated, and well armed people.
     

    Ectoman86

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 12, 2013
    71
    6
    Fort Wayne
    I seem to recall years ago another amendment that should of failed miserably...it did if I recall...and still ended up on the books...something by the tune of the Hughes amendment...I still worry something like that may push her crap through..
     
    Top Bottom