It has been raised , it is $20.00
Is there a way to pay by VISA?
It has been raised , it is $20.00
Is there a way to pay by VISA?
Getting roasted here. I will back off.
He also blocked the re-importation of M2 Carbines. I'm sure if he could implement the U.N. firearms treaty all on his own he would.
Getting roasted here. I will back off.
We all get it at some point, don't sweat it.
You think you're getting roasted here...
Getting roasted here. I will back off.
Just don't tell them that you're a Democrat.... that dogpile took me a little while to recover from...
I don't think so. I think I can fairly safely say that the vast majority of INGO posters acknowledge the current law(s) surrounding LTCH's and guns, in general but that doesn't mean acknowledgement equates to acceptance of constitutionality.Hmmm... It seems to me that an awful lot of people who claim to support the 2nd Amendment are in favor of LTCH, which is clearly a constitutional problem! Also in the forums I see a lot of people taking the "enforce the laws already on the books" approach, which is also unconstitutional.
I understand we've all been trained to relate the problems of drugs, mental illness, theft, murder and so on with gun ownership. It's hard not to, given the daily media and "education" system drumbeat.
But I'd think that more people would see that, just as any laws and assumed powers to license the press, or speech, or religion are constitutional violations, so too are impairments/limitations/caveats/registrations on gun ownership.
Am I the one seeing this all wrong?
The reason I'm bringing this up here is that it seems that even in this thread there's an underlying assumption that the government has legal authority to make laws about guns, when that authority has been specifically denied in both state and federal constitutions.
I heard that Obummer was going to use an executive order to ban bacon.