I love my 230.
I think you'll get a wide variety of opinions about that. A lot of it is just personal preference for certain features. I do like Glocks for their reliability and durability--but the grip angle just feels strange to me. If I draw and point, without looking at the sights, I consistently am aiming high with the Glock. With the SIG pistols, my natural point of aim is more centered on the target. I must admit, too, that I'm most comfortable with a DA/SA trigger. That long first trigger pull is a comfort to me, although I will say that I have carried Glocks IWB without much worry since I always use holsters that cover the trigger well.I've just bought my first one, a p239. I'm afraid to shoot it too much due to the fact I might like it and want to carry it. I did VERY little research but knew that Sig is a great manufacturer. What would be the advantage of a Sig over a Glock if anything other than preference? I love 1911's and Glocks but I don't see all that much advantage to either over all. Each has it's strong points but I couldn't say one is better for everything.