IDS: Armed teachers will likely endanger the safety of Texas students

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • NateIU10

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 19, 2008
    3,714
    38
    Maryland
    Armed teachers will likely endanger the safety of Texas students

    Indiana Daily Student - IDSnews.com
    print.jpg



    Armed teachers will likely endanger the safety of Texas students

    WE SAY The Wild West should stay in textbooks, not come to life in the classroom

    IDS | September 03, 2008

    The Wild Wild West is an integral part of American cultural history. We’ve all watched at least one old movie with John Wayne, some vigilante justice, and a showdown at high noon, preferably one that combines all three.

    But we draw the line at turning cowboy-movie psyche into living reality. That’s exactly what the school board in tiny Harrold, Texas, is doing with its decision to let select teachers carry concealed handguns at school, which it claims will deter a Columbine-style school shooting.

    The school in this small rural town accommodates children of all grade levels and barely has more than 100 students. The town has a low crime rate, with many of its citizens claiming they don’t even lock their doors; and it certainly does not have gang-related violence issues like schools in Houston or Dallas.

    Yet the superintendent, David Thweatt, is concerned children will be “fish in a bowl” if an attack were to occur and teachers were unarmed. Allowing a select number of the school’s two dozen teachers to undergo 40 hours of training in order to carry concealed guns in school seems like a natural step to Thweatt, who says people in his town are “not under the illusion that the police are there to protect them.”

    The small population and low crime rates of Harrold point out that the probability of a disgruntled student or deranged gunman laying siege to the school is extremely low. Training and allowing teachers to carry concealed guns is not only pointless, but a waste of the school district’s resources. This measure seems reactionary, without due cause or reason. In fact, residents are complaining that the school board did not adequately keep them informed of its plans and made little to no effort in gathering their opinions on the matter.

    The potential risks of this decision far outweigh any benefit that might occur in the highly unlikely situation of an attack within the school. There is always the danger of gun-related accidents. Even in the unlikely event that there is a security situation in the school, do we really want an O.K. Corral-style gun battle raging inside a K-12 school house?

    The bottom line is 40 hours of training does not a police officer make. As one member of the Houston Association of Teachers stated, “We are trained to teach and to educate. We are not trained to tame the Wild West.”


    Copyright © 2008 Indiana Daily Student

    Now, there was a VERY pro-2A article in todays paper also written by a girl I know who is the Chairwoman of the IU College Republicans, but I cannot find it online right now. When I do, I will post it up too, it's very good, but a little bit of misstating facts and not identifying that it's legal to carry on campus, just against school policy.
     

    ATM

    will argue for sammiches.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    30   0   0
    Jul 29, 2008
    21,019
    83
    Crawfordsville
    do we really want an O.K. Corral-style gun battle raging inside a K-12 school house?
    Absolutely! BOTH sides were armed at the Corral. Imagine Earp and the posse heading down there with night sticks to disarm the BGs.:noway: Huckleberry fish shoot.

    It's easier to love the sheep when they just say Baa.:sheep:
     
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    May 19, 2008
    1,836
    38
    Indian-noplace
    Hey you know what? I think mall shooting, school shootings, and mass rampages accompanied by firearms by death seeking idiots should all stay in books and movies too.

    Does it work?

    NO.

    Id like to meet the writer of this ^ face to face and tell them to GO BLOW IT OUT THERE HAPPY BUNNY SAVE THE WHALES WE ALL CAN LIVE WITH FLOWERS AND BIRDIES GOLDEN FAIRY I **** RAINBOWS ASS.

    There.

    I said it.
     

    cosermann

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Aug 15, 2008
    8,392
    113
    Staff at IU with their CCW could carry on campus until the mid 90's when then IU Pres. Brand changed the policy. I don't recall any reason other than arbitrariness and liberalness. Students were obviously SAFER then because of it. I know for a fact that 30% of the staff in my department did carry, and protested the change to no avail.
     

    kedie

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Jun 5, 2008
    2,036
    38
    Southeast of disorder.
    The O.K. Corral statement is the same old, tired, worn out, completely BS, and down right false argument the antis drag out every time something like this comes up. From this instance, to carrying in state parks, to LTCH. They always say it will turn into the wild west, and it never does.
     

    haldir

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 10, 2008
    3,183
    38
    Goshen
    Miles Brand was the worst thing that ever happened to my alma mater for a lot of reasons.

    As to the paper, when I was a student there, we called it the Indiana Daily Stupid. I see it has not gotten much better.
     

    hoosierdaddy

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 3, 2008
    4
    1
    Teachers need the option to carry guns

    One would think that GENERALLY a college teacher/instructor/professor (or whatever you want to call them) with a gun training course would be as well trusted and effective as the rent-a cops that are on campus now.
    The cool part would be- who is packin and who is not?
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 28, 2008
    1,590
    36
    Bloomington
    No, no it hasnt.

    However, the PRO-2A article was a breath of fresh air. Not a large breath, but a breath nonetheless. Sort of.

    In the "pro" RKBA article the author laid out a pretty good argument about why the ability to defend one's self is important. Then she concluded her article by saying that IU should allow a small contingent of known CCW people to carry. Essentially a free security system, with strings attached. IU has your name and chooses to allow (or disallow) you to carry at their whim, but the invitation is not extended to everyone. Her line of reasoning seems to be that it would be easy/better/safer if the University had some control and didn't allow CCW to just anybody.

    Maybe she has missed something. First, this is a right, not a privilege. We aren't asking IU to do us a favor. We are telling them "this is ********" and that we won't accept anything short of a full surrender. Don't steal my house and then try to bargain a price to sell it back to me.

    Second, what committee decides who should be on their list of "OK to carry" people? What are the BS criteria, and how many times will they change the rules in the middle of the game?

    Thirdly, there is no way I am allowing IU to put me on a list. Why should we in any way trust them to administrate this system when they are the ones who ruined it in the first place? I don't think it's necessary to elaborate further.

    Lastly, so many people seem to be missing the fact that IU simply needs to leave the issue alone. Delete the rule banning carry of campus, and more forward. Laws already exist to deal with crime and unlawful carry. We don't need them sticking their heads in it. I am pissed off that some portion of my tuition goes to fund a committee of lib-tards sitting around discussing why I shouldn't be allowed to manage my own self. The state already has a system for managing LTCH, allow it to work as designed.

    On a final inflammatory note, similar to "don't steal my house and bargain a deal to sell it back", don't make this an issue about CCW. Welcome to Indiana where we have a LTCH. Like it or not, OC is a right just the same way CC is. Choose what you wish, but don't throw OC under the bus while bartering with a group of idiots about why they should mind their own business and not trample your rights.
     

    NateIU10

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 19, 2008
    3,714
    38
    Maryland
    I must have totally missed the part of the article where it wasn't allowing everyone to carry, wow. I read it in my 15 minute break between class and can't find it online, but I agree with everything you have laid out below Josh. Gotta read better I guess :)

    No, no it hasnt.

    However, the PRO-2A article was a breath of fresh air. Not a large breath, but a breath nonetheless. Sort of.

    In the "pro" RKBA article the author laid out a pretty good argument about why the ability to defend one's self is important. Then she concluded her article by saying that IU should allow a small contingent of known CCW people to carry. Essentially a free security system, with strings attached. IU has your name and chooses to allow (or disallow) you to carry at their whim, but the invitation is not extended to everyone. Her line of reasoning seems to be that it would be easy/better/safer if the University had some control and didn't allow CCW to just anybody.

    Maybe she has missed something. First, this is a right, not a privilege. We aren't asking IU to do us a favor. We are telling them "this is ********" and that we won't accept anything short of a full surrender. Don't steal my house and then try to bargain a price to sell it back to me.

    Second, what committee decides who should be on their list of "OK to carry" people? What are the BS criteria, and how many times will they change the rules in the middle of the game?

    Thirdly, there is no way I am allowing IU to put me on a list. Why should we in any way trust them to administrate this system when they are the ones who ruined it in the first place? I don't think it's necessary to elaborate further.

    Lastly, so many people seem to be missing the fact that IU simply needs to leave the issue alone. Delete the rule banning carry of campus, and more forward. Laws already exist to deal with crime and unlawful carry. We don't need them sticking their heads in it. I am pissed off that some portion of my tuition goes to fund a committee of lib-tards sitting around discussing why I shouldn't be allowed to manage my own self. The state already has a system for managing LTCH, allow it to work as designed.

    On a final inflammatory note, similar to "don't steal my house and bargain a deal to sell it back", don't make this an issue about CCW. Welcome to Indiana where we have a LTCH. Like it or not, OC is a right just the same way CC is. Choose what you wish, but don't throw OC under the bus while bartering with a group of idiots about why they should mind their own business and not trample your rights.
     

    NateIU10

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 19, 2008
    3,714
    38
    Maryland
    I started out so pleased and it went down hill quickly.

    :(

    I'll be sure to ask her about the stipulations next time we talk :) Some people don't see the harm in requiring training, requiring permission or being on "a list", but I will definitely share some of my thoughts with her.

    ETA: I also think it is easier for her to try to argue her point by giving these preconditions, even though they are complete and utter crap :D
     

    techres

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Industry Partner
    Rating - 100%
    27   0   0
    Mar 14, 2008
    6,479
    38
    1
    I missed where the sample gates got metal detectors. Or where there were guards at 3rd & Jordan. Or frisking at the yearly dreidel spin. Or a checked perimeter....

    Oh, wait, it is an honor system. Except bad people have no honor and instead bet that you do in order to do their evil.

    It is beyond silly. It is somewhere near the corner of silly & dangerous.
     

    techres

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Industry Partner
    Rating - 100%
    27   0   0
    Mar 14, 2008
    6,479
    38
    1
    I surely hope you aren't suggesting...

    I suggest nothing. I am just happy to be a free member of the Hoosier state and not a student of tax payer supported school that puts its students into a position to make difficult choices.
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 28, 2008
    1,590
    36
    Bloomington
    Think it would cause a scene if I OC'ed near Union at around 12pm on a Wednesday? :D

    I'm not a student.

    Nope. The Students For Concealed Carry on Campus orchestrated an "empty holster protest" where participants wore their holster exposed but empty, as a symbol of our inability to defend ourselves. Very few people noticed. I had many people not even notice until I told them. I can understand that in passing, you might not notice, but I had to point it out to people who I had been engaging in conversation for several minutes.

    You can be pretty assured the students wouldn't notice. It's hassle from the administration that most people fear. The students can notice or not, I don't really care, they have no ability to reprimand me. The University does, sadly, so we can't risk it with them.
     
    Top Bottom