Is Jared Fogel from Subway fame dead?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Peter Potamus

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 16, 2015
    179
    18
    Indianapolis
    According to the talk radio discussion I just heard, Jared will plead guilty to possession but will also claim that he had no idea he had possession and that he never saw any of it. Supposedly, what the Feds found in his home was on drives related to the charity he founded and the other guy, Taylor, operated. Apparently, he will claim that he took possession of the drives when he fired Taylor but that he never reviewed what was on them.

    Could be? Maybe? Not likely?
     

    churchmouse

    I still care....Really
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    187   0   0
    Dec 7, 2011
    191,809
    152
    Speedway area
    According to the talk radio discussion I just heard, Jared will plead guilty to possession but will also claim that he had no idea he had possession and that he never saw any of it. Supposedly, what the Feds found in his home was on drives related to the charity he founded and the other guy, Taylor, operated. Apparently, he will claim that he took possession of the drives when he fired Taylor but that he never reviewed what was on them.

    Could be? Maybe? Not likely?

    Oh Boy.
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    35,854
    149
    Valparaiso
    According to the talk radio discussion I just heard, Jared will plead guilty to possession but will also claim that he had no idea he had possession and that he never saw any of it. Supposedly, what the Feds found in his home was on drives related to the charity he founded and the other guy, Taylor, operated. Apparently, he will claim that he took possession of the drives when he fired Taylor but that he never reviewed what was on them.

    Could be? Maybe? Not likely?

    Uh...........yeah, sure. I always plead guilty to crimes with pretty harsh penalties when I've not committed a crime.

    "Possession" under the statute is at least "knowing" possession. No knowledge, no crime.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    If you say I was in possession then I guess I can't argue with that and I will plead guilty but I'm not admitting knowledge of possessing what you claim that I possessed. :n00b:
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,961
    113
    According to the talk radio discussion I just heard, Jared will plead guilty to possession but will also claim that he had no idea he had possession and that he never saw any of it. Supposedly, what the Feds found in his home was on drives related to the charity he founded and the other guy, Taylor, operated. Apparently, he will claim that he took possession of the drives when he fired Taylor but that he never reviewed what was on them.

    Could be? Maybe? Not likely?

    I believe if he plays that game he won't make the factual and his plea will be rejected. Indiana doesn't have a "no contest" plea. You have to admit you are guilty to plead guilty.
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    35,854
    149
    Valparaiso
    I believe if he plays that game he won't make the factual and his plea will be rejected. Indiana doesn't have a "no contest" plea. You have to admit you are guilty to plead guilty.

    I'm assuming federal charges, but it illegal under state law too. Under federal law, he has to allocute meaning he has to admit to the essential elements of the charge. Don't know under state law, but i assume basically the same.

    Under federal law, the sentencing guidelines are very stiff on this.
     

    BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,961
    113
    I'm assuming federal charges, but it illegal under state law too. Under federal law, he has to allocute meaning he has to admit to the essential elements of the charge. Don't know under state law, but i assume basically the same.

    Under federal law, the sentencing guidelines are very stiff on this.

    Ah, didn't think about federal law. Derp.
     

    Ericpwp

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    18   0   0
    Jan 14, 2011
    6,753
    48
    NWI
    You try to give a guy the benefit of the doubt and this is what happens. :xmad:

    How can you look at anyone on TV anymore and not think they are bat **** crazy sickos?
     

    17 squirrel

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    May 15, 2013
    4,427
    63
    Yea, he's done. Having and distribution of child porn, crossing state lines for sex with minors..










    Ok, back to the double meat jokes.
     
    Top Bottom