Is Jared Fogel from Subway fame dead?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • BehindBlueI's

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    29   0   0
    Oct 3, 2012
    25,962
    113
    I guess he likes his meatballs really small,, news just said he traveled to NY for sex with a 6 yr old.

    Maybe a typo? Looks like 16, not 6.

    Supposedly the charging information obtained by TMZ: http://tmz.vo.llnwd.net/o28/newsdesk/tmz_documents/0819-jared-fogle-allegations-tmz.pdf

    The documents also allege that Fogle received images and videos of nude children from the former executive director of Fogle’s childhood obesity charity, Russell Taylor. Taylor also distributed pornographic images of children who were as young as 6 to Fogle, the documents allege.

    Right, but you're conflating the two. Per the documents he traveled to NY to have sex with underage prostitutes who were 17 and tried to solicit for 16 or younger. He didn't solicit 6 year olds. That was photos from his buddy.

    Jared pooped the bed either way, but at this point there's no proof or accusation he diddled a pre-pubescent.
     

    mrjarrell

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    19,986
    63
    Hamilton County
    Right, but you're conflating the two. Per the documents he traveled to NY to have sex with underage prostitutes who were 17 and tried to solicit for 16 or younger. He didn't solicit 6 year olds. That was photos from his buddy.

    Jared pooped the bed either way, but at this point there's no proof or accusation he diddled a pre-pubescent.

    This is how I read it, too. If he had stayed here in Indiana and had relations with the 17 year old, (without the photographs the girl sent and porn his buddy sent him) he'd be walking away Scott free, in all likelihood. Probably still be getting divorced, but not going to jail. The state lines and interstate sending of the pictures is what got him on the NYC stuff. The CP from his buddy is what really did him in and he's going to walk the plank for it.
     
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Jan 21, 2013
    4,905
    63
    Lawrence County
    Insert 6" joke here.

    Jarrod's new tat:

    subway-free-6-inch-sub-large-2.jpg
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    35,854
    149
    Valparaiso
    This is how I read it, too. If he had stayed here in Indiana and had relations with the 17 year old, (without the photographs the girl sent and porn his buddy sent him) he'd be walking away Scott free....

    If they have the evidence of the child porn possession and distribution that is alleged in the Information,....the only walking he would be doing is the perp walk. The allegation is that he was more than just a passive receiver of unwanted videos....way more.
     

    mrjarrell

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 18, 2009
    19,986
    63
    Hamilton County
    If they have the evidence of the child porn possession and distribution that is alleged in the Information,....the only walking he would be doing is the perp walk. The allegation is that he was more than just a passive receiver of unwanted videos....way more.
    That's why I said without that particular aspect.
     

    17 squirrel

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    May 15, 2013
    4,427
    63
    Right, but you're conflating the two. Per the documents he traveled to NY to have sex with underage prostitutes who were 17 and tried to solicit for 16 or younger. He didn't solicit 6 year olds. That was photos from his buddy.

    Jared pooped the bed either way, but at this point there's no proof or accusation he diddled a pre-pubescent.

    Yes you are correct.. I mixed them up..

    It makes not much difference, he had a couple of PCs, a few laptops, half a dozen thumb drives, I thought a few thou CDs and dvd's and I don't recall what else they said.
     

    LEaSH

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    43   0   0
    Aug 10, 2009
    5,819
    119
    Indianapolis
    Look, if a guy has a preexisting prurient interest, then the boner drone shows up....

    I'm just saying that there may be more fault to spread around.

    Well, I'm not certain, but I doubt sexual deviancy(of all sorts) was invented here. No doubt it is a popular hobby.

    And what is the boner drone?
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    35,854
    149
    Valparaiso
    His wife is filing for divorce. His lawyers agreed not to ask for less than 5 years. The Feds agreed not to ask for more than 12 years. If one of those girls was my daughter I would have agreed to not use more than 12 rounds.

    Now, it's up to whether the judge thinks something in that range is appropriate. Not asking under 5 was kind of a no brainer because that's the statutory minimum of many of the charges.

    [edit]

    Wowzers- reading the plea agreement now. While the prosecutor agreed to not ask for more than 151 months (12 years, 7 months), the potention range is 60 to 360 months (30 years) and the plea deal acknowledges that the Court has discretion to sentence within that range, not the agreed upon range.

    The Defendant understands that if the Court decides to impose a sentence higher or lower than the recommendation of either party,..., then the Defendant will not be permitted to withdraw this plea of guilty for that reason and will be bound by this plea of guilty.

    In addition to the $1.4 mil restitution, the issue of a fine is left open and he will be forfeiting $50,000 in lieu of specific items of property.

    If you read the Information linked above, you've seen the facts that he admitted to. It's essentially cut and paste. The plea deal leaves open further charges for other victims or other acts that are not specifically charged.
     
    Last edited:

    Stickfight

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 6, 2010
    925
    18
    Dountoun ND
    I didn't follow much of this story and just assumed the raid on his house was to collect evidence on the guy he hired to run his foundation, but this guy is hosed now. Amazing that someone who'd more or less lucked into a nice comfortable life would risk having it turned into what will no doubt be a painful, difficult one.
     

    Denny347

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    13,458
    149
    Napganistan

    I don't know the first thing about Mr. Fogel or his issues here. What I do know is that a collection of extremely bad looking circumstantial evidence could compel someone to cut a deal who has done nothing wrong, but knows that it could easily look the other way, to plead to a lesser charge just to move on. Pleading out doesn't mean the original crime, or any crime, was ever committed. Of course, sometimes it does. We may never know the whole truth.

    Regards,

    Doug
    So, a person pleading guilty to a crime and we must still refer to him as the "accused" and not the "criminal"? Look I understand what you are trying to say, I tell people I am arresting all the time, "Just because I have PC does not mean you are guilty." Generally to help calm the situation down. However, if that same arrestee pleads guilty in court, I will refer to him as a convicted "what ever the charge". I will not automatically assume that a person pleading guilty was an innocent forced to plea unless there is compelling evidence to think so. When Jared pleads guilty (and why would you ever VOLUNTEER to become a sex offender) he becomes a convicted child molester.
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    35,854
    149
    Valparaiso
    So, a person pleading guilty to a crime and we must still refer to him as the "accused" and not the "criminal"? Look I understand what you are trying to say, I tell people I am arresting all the time, "Just because I have PC does not mean you are guilty." Generally to help calm the situation down. However, if that same arrestee pleads guilty in court, I will refer to him as a convicted "what ever the charge". I will not automatically assume that a person pleading guilty was an innocent forced to plea unless there is compelling evidence to think so. When Jared pleads guilty (and why would you ever VOLUNTEER to become a sex offender) he becomes a convicted child molester.

    On this site, I have campaigned long an hard for the presumption of innocence and against the rush to judgment....but I've read the plea agreement and have seen exactly what he is admitting to. He has admitted to being a criminal, so calling him that is perfectly appropriate. He has the means to fight a false charge, but has chosen to ADMIT to these things. That tells me all I need to know, ESPECIALLY when he stands to sit in federal prison for at least 5 years and maybe 30. That tells me that it would only go worse for him if he forced a trial.
     

    Denny347

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    13,458
    149
    Napganistan
    On this site, I have campaigned long an hard for the presumption of innocence and against the rush to judgment....but I've read the plea agreement and have seen exactly what he is admitting to. He has admitted to being a criminal, so calling him that is perfectly appropriate. He has the means to fight a false charge, but has chosen to ADMIT to these things. That tells me all I need to know, ESPECIALLY when he stands to sit in federal prison for at least 5 years and maybe 30. That tells me that it would only go worse for him if he forced a trial.
    Yeah, I read that as well...bad bad bad.
     
    Top Bottom