nawainwright
Expert
Judge sides with illegal immigrants' kids in Ind. - FoxNews.com
Kinda surprised I didn't see this here first. Actually found it on the Northeast Shooters board.
I'm conflicted on this ruling for a couple reasons. I don't like judicial activism and this seems to fall on the correct side of that, he follows the letter of the law (depending on how you interpret it).
The second reason is this quote "But Falk said state officials had accepted paternity affidavits for years without Social Security numbers from those who couldn't provide them. And, he said, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services had advised states that the numbers weren't necessary." If the numbers aren't necessary why are we (and not they) subject to them?
Kinda surprised I didn't see this here first. Actually found it on the Northeast Shooters board.
I'm conflicted on this ruling for a couple reasons. I don't like judicial activism and this seems to fall on the correct side of that, he follows the letter of the law (depending on how you interpret it).
The second reason is this quote "But Falk said state officials had accepted paternity affidavits for years without Social Security numbers from those who couldn't provide them. And, he said, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services had advised states that the numbers weren't necessary." If the numbers aren't necessary why are we (and not they) subject to them?
