One Shot One Kill
Sharpshooter
"These people" ??
"These people" ??
I'm just ****ing with you. It's all good.
Yeah I caught on after a while hah!I'm just ****ing with you. It's all good.
BIGI try to treat everyone the same until I hae reason not to. I truly do my best everyday to look past people's shell. I'll be honest and admit it's hard to do with some stereotypes I've had beat into my brain. A person with a disability isn't one I would ever treat different. I'd stand up next to anyone being picked on. I don't like bully's that prey on people they feel inferior to themselves.
I'm walking and posting and I missed my turn! Yes, I am one of Those people!!
Seems strange that she didn't put her husband on the lease! Why would you not have him on it?It's Clemson University student housing I believe.
Seems strange that she didn't put her husband on the lease! Why would you not have him on it?
My guess is that rent is based on occupancy. Occupancy is based on named individuals on the lease, whether they are actually living there or not. My guess is that they opted to save money for the 11 months out of the year they knew he wouldn't be there. Either they had other plans for when he might come home, didn't expect him to be home longer than the 7-day limit, or just didn't think it would be an issue. Either way, they made the bed, they get to lie in it.Seems strange that she didn't put her husband on the lease! Why would you not have him on it?
It's not about being greedy. It's university housing. One 1-bedroom apartment is probably a drop in the bucket. It's about contract terms and the ****-storm that would exist for making exceptions. Don't you want people to uphold their end of the deal when you make an agreement with them?Saw this story on the news yesterday. Despicable is a good word for it. Some very greedy bastards out there.
The way I understand it (so probably wrong), he lives on base in another state and doesn't normally reside there. So since student housing rent is usually based on occupancy, they probably elected to leave him off since he wouldn't be there often.
Gotcha ya! Wasn't sure what kind of lease it was. I was a maintenance man for section 8 housing before I got married. We had to go around at night and take down the plate numbers of all the cars to make sure no one had anyone living with them. You'd be shocked at how many low income single mothers paying $50 a month rent, had boyfriends working in the mills making $80,000 living with them. Or maybe you'd wouldn't be surprised!My guess is that rent is based on occupancy. Occupancy is based on named individuals on the lease, whether they are actually living there or not. My guess is that they opted to save money for the 11 months out of the year they knew he wouldn't be there. Either they had other plans for when he might come home, didn't expect him to be home longer than the 7-day limit, or just didn't think it would be an issue. Either way, they made the bed, they get to lie in it.
It's not about being greedy. It's university housing. One 1-bedroom apartment is probably a drop in the bucket. It's about contract terms and the ****-storm that would exist for making exceptions. Don't you want people to uphold their end of the deal when you make an agreement with them?
I guess there's always two sides to the story. The tenants' story was that the husband's release and showing up at the apartment afterwards had been agreed to in advance. But it's all about what's in writing in the lease. On that I must agree with you.
The specific word used doesn't matter, the way it is used does matter.
When a word associated with a group of people is applied to someone outside that group as an insult then you are insulting both the individual (by saying "he is like one of them") and the group by saying it is so shameful to be a member of this group that lumping other people with you is an insult.
I am far from PC but I don't make fun of people that were born with real challenges and I don't use inclusion as a member of "that group" as an insult. Comparing someone you find reprehensible, disgusting or stupid to "one of those people" is an insult to "those people" as much as to the individual you are disparaging.
the landlord in this storyis well within his rights to enforce the lease. And it's a bunch of hypocrites who are condemning him simply because the lease violator is a service member. i doubt the landlord could bring criminal charges since it is an occupancy issue, not a true trespass issue (though that line is blurry). And I have my doubts about his ability to unilaterally increase rent, unless the lease stipulates such changes are automatic when the proper triggers are pulled.
They say that now. It may be true. But I'm betting it's not. Tenants are liars.
They say that now. It may be true. But I'm betting it's not. Tenants are liars.
If you use membership in a group or affliction with a physical or mental condition as an insult then it follows that you would be ashamed or embarrassed to be included in that group. If you don't think it would be insulting then why use it as an insult?
Make fun of personal choices if you wish but let's not use disabilities as insults. It is rude to those that actually have the disability.
Surely OP's wit and strong vocabulary could come up with another term.
If you use membership in a group or affliction with a physical or mental condition as an insult then it follows that you would be ashamed or embarrassed to be included in that group. If you don't think it would be insulting then why use it as an insult?
Make fun of personal choices if you wish but let's not use disabilities as insults. It is rude to those that actually have the disability.
The use of the term "OP" is offensive to me. Please stop its use at once.