Saving for later…
We already knew that as well as most of the BS that spews from their mouthsThe left's assertion that this is "rare" is completely bogus.
EXPLAIN PLEASE?When I get on a computer and not a phone I’m going into the weeds on this study. If we get the “Fix Nantz v State 2002” bill up in the House committee I am citing this one til the cows come home.
81.9% of defensive gun uses never fire a shot. That’s a significant percentage in any book. From a professor at Georgetown (university, not Indiana) so hardly a bastion of pro-2A thought.EXPLAIN PLEASE?
I thought nantz was the drunk guy waving a gun around case?81.9% of defensive gun uses never fire a shot. That’s a significant percentage in any book. From a professor at Georgetown (university, not Indiana) so hardly a bastion of pro-2A thought.
The big issue with Nantz is the Appeals Court declared pointing a firearm was deadly force.I thought nantz was the drunk guy waving a gun around case?
coming from you... that means something.I downloaded the entire 49 page report. Wow that's a painful read.
That reminds me, I need more pmags.Only 542,000,000 mags, aye? Not bad once you remove all the shotguns, wheel guns, bolt rifles, etc. I am doing my part with 20+.