Double stack vs single stack would be a huge difference. All while increasing size of firearm minimally.Anyone have any experience with them? Seems like main difference between the LCP II And the Max is the sights?
Thoughts
thanks
Honestly I am not really a fan of the 380 but as the saying goes better to have a parachute and not need one versus needing one and not having it. I really think it will shine as a in case of emergency break glass piece.I picked up a Max about a month ago. Love it. The sights are great and it shoots well. The trigger pinches my finger a little like it did to Hickock45 but that's not a big deal. 12+1 in the pocket IS a big deal. I love it.
I'll be selling my Glock 43 soon because of this gun.
I'd rather have 12 rounds of .380 though than 7 of 9mm. But the .380's a little lighter than the 9mm, but otherwise flies through the air almost identically. I run Underwood Xtreme Penetrators and Xtreme Defenders, so penetration won't be a problem as it is with some .380 ammo. It's perfect for a compact gun like this but I wouldn't run .380 in a larger gun. No reason to.Honestly I am not really a fan of the 380 but as the saying goes better to have a parachute and not need one versus needing one and not having it. I really think it will shine as a in case of emergency break glass piece.
Looked at a 42 from a member here before I bought the Max. The 42 was not a comfortable gun to hold for me. Like the Max much better.I've got one. Shoots about 6" low at 7 yards, and no, it's not me. My Glock 42 is a far superior .380, but it doesn't have 12+1 capacity and is bigger than the Ruger LCP Max. The Max is good for what it is, a small 13 round, lightweight belly gun for times when you can't carry something more formidable. Point shooting works fine at the distances that this is intended for.
And that would be a bad thing?I purposely don't look at guns like these. If I did, I would be tempted to buy one. If I bought one, I would be tempted to carry one.
Yes, for me. I don't judge what others carry but I have standards that whatever I carry have to meet. Most of these are not going to be met by little pocket guns. I admit, it can be tempting though.And that would be a bad thing?
Ok looking at it that way makes more sense.Yes, for me. I don't judge what others carry but I have standards that whatever I carry have to meet. Most of these are not going to be met by little pocket guns. I admit, it can be tempting though.
Well I am still looking for a home for that box of 32 acp I purchased by mistake.Still waiting for someone to marry the super capacity sub-sub compact with .32 ACP.
12+1? Hell, why not 17+1?
I'd look into something like this for running if I didn't like the ergos of the J-frame so much for that specific application.
Clearly I must not be the only one to pay the stupid tax lolIt can live with that box of 16 gauge I accidentally bought at Walmart one time.
With the new 30 super carry we might actually see it happen. At .313 it's basically a 32 acp on steroids without the rimlock. 14 +1 in a subcompact would be interesting, especially at 350ft/lbs. But a subcompact may not have enough "meat" to handle that 45Kpsi loadStill waiting for someone to marry the super capacity sub-sub compact with .32 ACP.
12+1? Hell, why not 17+1?
I'd look into something like this for running if I didn't like the ergos of the J-frame so much for that specific application.