you use the same arguments against this "medicine" that others use For vaccines. What are you going to say when someone comes on here and talks about how they watched their loved one die of cervical cancer when a simple shot would have saved her? The odds may be high (if the 2.4 per 100k is correct) then why isn't the high odds against someone having an adverse reaction also just a reason to scare, pressure and coerce everyone into NOT getting a vax?
The industry endlessly pours scary statistics on us to sell drugs. The season's flu deaths, the latest "outbreak." And there's only a one in a zillion to have a side effect. Isn't that right? The difference is that the skeptical side isn't hawking products.
Last edited: